Setu project not stalled? — TR Baalu

SSCP: Baalu dismisses claim of security threat

Chennai, Feb. 02: Union Shipping Minister T R Baalu today said the contentious Sethusamudram Shipping Channel Project (SSCP) would not pose any threat to country’s security as envisaged by Coast Guard (CG) Chief R F Contractor.

Asked about the CG’s remark that security issues were bound to rise once the project was implemented, Mr Baalu said the project was cleared by all departments before it was launched.

”The project was cleared by the Union Cabinet after extensive discussions and the Defence Ministry had also sent a note to the government on the importance of implementing the project”, he added. ”There will not be any threat to India’s security once the ships start sailing in the Channel”, he said.

Mr Baalu’s remarks come two days after CG Director General Contractor said there will be security risks because it is a maritime area. And by virtue of close boundary lines between Sri Lanka and India, obviously the security implications are more”.

”Projects like the Sethusamudram could bring in more security problems. The small waterway could prove a security risk,” the Coast Guard DG had said. Admiral Contractor’s views assumes significance in the wake of Naval Chief Suresh Mehta’s observation that the project might be unviable for big ships.

The SSCP is already hit by controversy with the BJP and other frontline Hindu organisations opposing demolition of ‘Ram Sethu'(Adam’s Bridge) as part of dredging near the Bridge area and the Supreme court granting a stay for dredging in that area. On Congress Spokesperson Ambika Soni’s remarks that whether the Ram Sethu was a natural formation or man-made was a question of Hindu sentiments, Mr Baalu said it was her own personal remarks.

”It is not the view of the Centre , which was committed to implementing the project after overcoming legal hurdles”, he added.

The four-member ministerial committee formed by the Centre had submitted its report to the Union cabinet. The cabinet would study it and decide on when to submit it before the apex court, which had granted four weeks time to the Centre to file its affidavit explaining its stand on the issue.

Sunday February 3 2008 01:25 IST (Dinamani)WôUûW ®Uo£dÏm ×jRLjÕdÏ UôVôY§ G§ol×Xdù]ü, ©l. 2: WôUo Utßm ºûR Tt± BhúNTLWUô] LÚjÕdLs APe¡V ×jRLjÕdÏ Uj§V AWÑ RûP ®§dL úYiÓm Guß EjRWl©WúRN ØRpYo UôVôY§ á±Ùs[ôo. EjRWl©WúRNj RûXSLo Xdù]ü®p Tj§¬ûL ¨ÚToLÞdÏ N²d¡ZûU úTh¥ A°jR AYo CûRj ùR¬®jRôo. NÁTj§p §p#«p ùY°«PlThP CkR ×jRLjûRj RûP ùNnV úYiÓm. CÕ Tt± ©WRUÚdÏd L¥Rm GÝR CÚd¡ú\u. EjRWl©WúRNj§p £X CPeL°p CkR ×jRLjÕdÏj RûP ®§dLd úLô¬ BolTôhPm SPkÕs[Õ. AYoLÞdÏ TÏ_u NUôw Lh£«u BRWÜ EiÓ. G²àm AûU§Vô] Øû\«p BolTôhPm CÚdL úYiÓm Gu\ôo UôVôY§.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: