Rama Setu: not man-made, Cabine note; UPA playing with fire, Rajnath

Rama Setu: not man-made, Cabinet note; UPA playing with fire, Rajnath

Rajnath: UPA is playing with fire 

Jan. 18, 2008 1:20:42 PM

Reacting to the TIMES NOW story on the draft Cabinet note by the Shipping ministry terming Rama Sethu as a natural formation, BJP President Rajnath Singh has reacted strongly saying that the bridge was buit by Lord Rama is a matter of faith and the BJP will give the Centre a fitting reply after the former submits its affidavit to the Supreme Court.
“I believe questions of faith and belief cannot be answered with history and science. We are also waiting to see what kind of an affidavit the Government files in the Supreme Court. We will react only after that,” said Singh today (January 18).
Singh told TIMES NOW off the record however that the UPA was ‘playing with fire’ and would be engulfed by its heat if it chose to stoke the religious passions of the people. He said the Rama Sethu was a matter of faith and non negotiable, and any attempt to classify it as manmade which would entail the UPA dredging it, or cut through it, would not be allowed. The BJP will await the text of the affidavit before giving a fitting reply, added Singh.

Sethu is not man-made: Cabinet note 

1/18/2008 12:15:09 PM 

The Government is closely looking at a proposal to go ahead with the controversial Sethusamudran project, after all the ministries involved in assessing the project gave their go- ahead saying the Ram Sethu is a natural structure and not man-made. A Cabinet note in available to TIMES NOW says that the Ram Sethu was not made by any mythological person.
Significantly, the Cabinet note differs with the expert committe set up to look into the entire matter on one crucial point – The committee had said that archaelogists should be involved in the crucial dredging process, but the Cabinet note rejects this view.
The draft note to the Cabinet prepared by the Ministry of Shipping Road Transport and Highways Department – reviews the recommendations given by the Government-appointed 10-member committee of experts, as well as those given by the Ministry of Culture. It is the Ministry of Culture that had in particular said that no archaeologists would be required during the dredging process.
News of the Cabinet note comes two days after the Supreme Court gave the Government two more weeks to file the affidavit in the case.
Here are some of the crucial excerpts from this document that TIMES NOW has exclusive access to:
1. The note while defining the Ram Setu very clearly says: “It is a clear-cut natural stratigraphic of cyclic sedimentation process and not a manmade feature.”
2. The note goes on to say – “There is no merit in the demand of the petitioners that the Rama Sethu should be declared as a national monument and should be brought on the World Heritage List.”
3. The draft note goes on to observe that the Ministry of Culture was of the view that it may not be desirable to associate archaelogists with the project.
Lending perspective to the development, TIMES NOW’s Senior Editor Srinjoy Chowdhury says in 90% of cases a note that succeeds in reaching the Cabinet is immediately cleared and that the same can be expected of this particular reccomendation.
“All ministries concerned particularly the Shipping Ministry has made it very clear that Rama Sethu is a natural bridge and there is no reason why the Sethu cannot go ahead. The minustry also swept aside the point of involving archaeologists, saying could be hoped to be gained from any excavation. This point has been put forward more strongly by the ministry than even the Expert Committee or the Culture Ministry,” observed Chowdhury. 
However the Cabinet note’s contents will not go down well with the critics of the Sethusamudram project – chiefly the BJP and the Sangh Pariwar who hold that ‘Adam’s Bridge’ as it has been traditionally known in the West, is actually ‘Rama Sethu’ – constructed by the Hindu god Rama and with links to the epic ‘Ramayana’.
“Besides the project’s political opponents, there are others like environmentalists who think the project is not necessary or beneficial and even harmful – they can also be expected to react strongly to the note,” Chowdhury added.



One Response to “Rama Setu: not man-made, Cabine note; UPA playing with fire, Rajnath”

  1. Vijayalakshmi Says:

    The blatantly partisan UPA Govt has been conducting itself as a Govt of the minorities, for the minorities and by the minorities. When Hindu sentiments are sought to be so brazenly trampled upon by the anti-Hindu Govt., the aggrieved hindus will certainly defend their Rama Sethu. More than 10lakh people came forward to demonstrate their commitment to the Cause. The Govt will crumble under the fury of the Hindus.
    There are records available to prove the historicity of Rama and Krishna, but prejudiced and self-seeking politicians playing votebank politics, are pretending to look the other way when confronted with the reality. You can wake up a sleeping man, but you cannot wake up one who is pretending to be asleep. But we Hindus and patriots of India that is Bharat cannot allow the destruction of our heritage sites by anti-national parties manning the Govt.
    BJP being a political party, must highlight all aspects of the SSCP to force the Govt to scrap the wasteful project. This will earn them the respect of the people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: