Archive for February, 2008

Setusamudram hey kaarasthan

February 19, 2008

Setusamudrahm hey kaarasthan (Marathi word meaning: place for conspiracies)

A few days ago, CM of Tamil Nadu spoke of conspiracy (caditittam) to scrap the Setu project.without naming the conspirators. Now, TR Baalu names a Union Minister as one of the conspirators; and this Minister protests being named part of the conspiracy.

Other conspiracies include the US Naval Operational Directive of 23 June 2005 just a week before the inauguration of the Setu p are well-known and documented. Why does the supercop want to convert these waters into international waters and why do the central govt. functionaries succumb to the supercop pressures?

And, how about the sea-sand godowns (and bail granted despite 19 FIRs) which have mushroomed in Setusamudram to export the mineral wealth contained in the sands, including thorium? How about Setusamudram being the nuclear resource zone of the world accounting for 32% of the world reserves of thorium?

How about the inaction of the government to prepare for the next devastating tsunami reported in Nature magazine of 6 Sept. 2007.

Conspiracies everywhere, Setusamudram hey kaarasthan.

k

Delhi Diary: Leakers-1, Jammers -0!

By a Sify correspondent
Monday, 18 February , 2008, 18:33

Baalu ko gussa kyon aata hain?

Rumours of a possible Cabinet reshuffle and his fall from favour with the powers that be in the UPA have these days makes Minister of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, T R Baalu lose his temper at the smallest provocation.

At a recent meeting of the Group of Ministers (GoM) on the Sethusamudram issue, Minister for culture and Tourism Ambika Soni was at the receiving end of Balu’s outburst. When Sonia said that the Archaeological Survey of India could not file an affidavit in the Supreme Court because it had itself conducted no study to establish whether the Adams Bridge or Ram Sethu was man-made or not, Balu openly accused her of “a conspiracy to block the project.” The outburst stunned every one, including Minister of External Affairs Pranab Mukherjee, who was presiding over the GoM. But before others could react, Soni stood up and walked out in a huff saying, “I am not here to be accused of a conspiracy!”

http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14606652

Setu project: TR Baalu publicly accuses Ambika Soni for the delay

February 18, 2008

Setu project: TR Baalu publicly accuses Ambika Soni for the delay

Monday February 18 2008 00:00 IST (Dinamani, Tamil daily)

úNÕ §hP RôURjÕdÏ ¿eLsRôu LôWQm: ¥.Bo. TôÛ×Õ§p#, ©l. 17: úNÕ NØj§Wj §hPm RôURUôYRtÏ ¿eLsRôu LôWQm Guß Uj§V LXôNôWj Õû\ AûUfNo Am©Lô úNô² ÁÕ LlTp úTôdÏYWjÕj Õû\ AûUfNo ¥.Bo. TôÛ T¡WeLUôL Ït\mNôh¥Ùs[ôo. Uj§V AûUfNWûYd áhPj§p TôÛ CqYôß Ït\mNôh¥]ôo Gußm CR]ôp Bj§WUûPkR AûUfNo Am©Lô úLôTj§p áhPj§#ÚkÕ ùY°úV±®hPôo Gußm §p# YhPôWeLs ùR¬®jR]. úNÕ NØj§Wj §hPjûR ¨û\úYtßYÕ ùRôPoTôL Lôe¡Wv – §ØL CûPúV LÚjÕ úYßTôÓ SôÞdÏ Sôs A§L¬jÕ YÚ¡\Õ. Cl ©Wfû]Vôp CÚ Lh£LÞdÏm CûPúV E\®p ®¬Np HtThÓs[RôLd á\lTÓ¡\Õ. úNÕ LôpYôn §hPm ϱjÕ ®Yô§lTRtLôL êjR Uj§V AûUfNoLs áhPm AiûU«p §p#«p SûPùTt\Õ. C§p LXôNôWj Õû\ AûUfNo Am©Lô úNô²dÏm LlTp úTôdÏYWjÕj Õû\ AûUfNo ¥.Bo. TôÛÜdÏm CûPúV LôWNôW YôdÏYôRm HtThPRôL á\lTÓ¡\Õ. "Cj §hPm LôXRôURUôYRtÏ ¿eLs Rôu LôWQm' Guß Am©Lô úNô²ûVl TôojÕ TôÛ úSÚdÏ úSo Ït\mNôh¥]ôWôm. JÚ LhPj§p úLôTj§p Am©Lô úNô² AûUfNWûYd áhPj§#ÚkÕ ùY°úV±®hPôo. AlúTôÕ, áhPj§p TeúLt\ êjR AûUfNoLs ©WQôl ØLo´, Ao_ýu £e Es°húPôo ùNnYR±VôÕ §ûLjÕl úTôn CÚkR]o Gußm ùR¬V YÚ¡\Õ. Am©Lô, TôÛ úUôRXôp GkR Ø¥Üm GÓdL Ø¥VôUp áhPm Tô§«úXúV Ø¥kRÕ. CÕ Ï±jÕ Uj§V AûUfNo ¥.Bo. TôÛûYj ùRôPo× ùLôiÓ úLhPúTôÕ, LÚjÕ á\ UßjÕ®hPôo. HtùL]úY ¨oQ«dLlThP TôûR«p úNÕ NØj§Wj §hPjûR ®ûWkÕ ¨û\úYt\ úYiÓm Guß §ØL ùRôPokÕ Y#Ùßj§ YÚ¡\Õ. B]ôp Am©Lô úNô² CûR HtL UßlTRôLj ùR¬¡\Õ. NoYúRN ®§LÞdÏ HtT ®¬Yô] ùRôp#Vp BnÜ SPjR úYiÓm GuT§p Am©Lô úNô² Eß§VôL CÚlTRôLd á\lTÓ¡\Õ. BnÜ ùNnYRtÏ Øu×, Cj §hPj§p GkR Ø¥Üm GÓdLd áPôÕ Gußm AYo Y#Ùßj§ YÚ¡\ôo. B]ôp ÁiÓm BnÜ ùNnV úYiÓm GuTûR §ØL RWl©p HtL®pûX. G]úY CÕ Ï±jÕ êjR AûUfNoLs A[®p úT£j ¾oÜLôQ Ø¥Ü ùNnVlThPÕ. ARu T¥ AûUfNWûYd áhPØm §p#«p SûPùTt\Õ. áhPm úUôR#p Ø¥kRÕ. CRt¡ûPúV úNÕ NØj§Wj §hPm ùRôPoTôL EfN ¿§Uu\j§p SûPùTtß YÚm YZd¡p, Uj§V AW£u ¨ûXlTôhûP ùR¬®lTRtLôL úUÛm 4 YôWm AYLôNm A°dLlThÓs[Õ. ARuT¥ Uôof ØRp YôWj§p AW£u ¨ûX ϱjÕ ©WUôQ Tj§Wm RôdLp ùNnV úYiÓm.

http://tinyurl.com/yuhlsq

Give up Setu project: Togadia

February 17, 2008

Give up Sethu project: Togadia

Special Correspondent

VADODARA (17 Feb. 2008): Vishwa Hindu Parishad international general secretary Pravin Togadia has warned of a nation-wide popular agitation if the Centre went ahead with the Sethu Samudram Ship Canal Project.

Talking to journalists at the conclusion of the two-day conference of the Seva Sangam organised by the VHP at Sokhda village near Vadodara on Sunday, Dr. Togadia said the VHP’s huge rally in Delhi on December 30 and its “chakka jam” programme on the Sethu Samudram issue might have given the government an idea about the popular sentiments against tampering with the Ram Sethu. VHP national president Ashok Singhal also attended the deliberations.

Pointing out that lakhs of people attended the Delhi rally and participated in the “chakka jam,” Dr. Togadia said the government should give up any idea of going ahead with the ship canal project. Asked about Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi’s insistence on going ahead with the project, he said: “The VHP will not tolerate any attempt to play with Lord Ram.”

http://www.hindu.com/2008/02/18/stories/2008021854781200.htm

Togadia warns of agitation on Sethu project

Vadodara (PTI): The Vishwa Hindu Parishad will launch an agitation if the government goes ahead with the Sethu Samudram Ship Canal Project, its international general secretary Pravin Togadia warned on Sunday.

Togadia told reporters at Sokhda village on the outskirts of the city that after VHP’s huge rally in Delhi about a month ago, the government should give up any idea or plans of going ahead with the project.

He said lakhs of people from various parts of the country had attended the rally to register their protest on this issue. Earlier, the ‘chakka jam’ (road blockade) organised by the organisation against the government’s stand on ‘Ram Setu’ too had received the overwhelming support from people across the country, he claimed.

Togadia is in Sokhda to attend a two-day conference of Seva Sangam organised by VHP for serving the poor and needy nationwide through 6,056 projects.

When pointed out that Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Karunanidhi may be pushing for the implementation of the Sethusamudram project, Togadia said that any attempt to “play with Lord Ram will not be tolerated”.

He also stressed on the need to build the Ram temple at the same place in Ayodhya and said the VHP will not allow any shift from the original site to any other place.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/002200802172040.htm

Readying the nation to face the next devastating tsunami: response to Dr. Goel

February 17, 2008

tsunami2.jpgSunda plate thrust (plate tectonics) which will cause the next tsunami on Indian Ocean (Nature Magazine, 6 Sept. 2007)

tsunami1.jpgA model of tsunami likely to hit Indian coast (Nature Magazine, 6 Sept. 2007)

indraindranifaults.jpgIndra, Indrani fault lines flanking Rama Setu

heatflowmap.jpgRama Setu as rama’s hotspot with as an intense geothermal zone

japantsunamiwall1.jpgA tsunami protection wall built on Japan coastline

 Dear Dr. Goel,

Thanks for your note of Feb. 11, 2008

For ready reference, I am attaching the following:

Annex A (Background info. on mails/letters sent earlier)

Annex B (Threatened tsunami in Indian Ocean , Nature magazine)

Annex C Letters by scientists

Annex D Geotectonic, Geothermal, Geoenvironmental aspects of Setusamudram

At the outset, please accept hearty congratulations for setting up a world-class tsunami warning system. This is a feather in the cap of Dept. of Earth Sciences and the Indian scientific community. Present and future generations will hail the scientists for this superb achievement.

Sorry for the six-days’ delay in responding to your email, Dr. PS Goel. I thought I should take time to bring to your attention science issues beyond the tsunami warning system on an issue of such serious national concern, affecting the integrity of Bharatiya coastline.

Every scientist also has social responsibility and when a scientist goes to town with half-baked information which is likely to be misreported by the media, and mis-interpreted by readers, caution is warranted.

I am shocked that science has become a parody on the issue related to Rama Setu and I am dismayed by the types of opinions being bandied about in the media by scientists who are expected to show a certain degree of national, civic responsibility.

Let me focus attention on the following aspects covered in detail in the annexed documents which have been made available earlier to the Govt. functionaries.

The issue related to a forthcoming tsunami reported by a responsible science magazine, Nature in its issue of Sept. 6, 2007 is, in my view, the most serious warning faced by India for centuries.

If a devastation is anticipated which will expose 6 to 7 crore people from Kolkata to Kerala at risk by a devastating tsunami, more devastating than the 26 December 2004 tsunami, it is the responsibility of scientific community to take notice, deliberate, investigate and come up with specific and IMMEDIATE action plans to alleviate the impending sufferings of people – given the rehabilitation experience of 26 Dec. 2004 — and possible damage to the properties in the coastline of the Indian Ocean.

I accuse the Government of India utter irresponsibility on the following grounds:

  1. Why hasn’t Govt. responded to Prof. Tad Murty’s citation of the Alaska tsunam of 1964 which devastated the Alberni port on the Alberni canal? Is Setu channel any different from Alberni canal situation?
  2. Why haven’t the scientists who reported in the Nature magazine of 6 Sept. 2007 been contacted and why haven’t a series of scientific meets organized to review the oncoming threat and recommend palliative measures?
  3. Establishing a tsunami warning system is one thing; taking preventive measures to mitigate the effects of a tsunami is another. What steps have been initiated and publicised by the Government on tsunami protection measures?
Here is a picture of a tsunami wall in Japan coast (attached).
 
  1. Is the Govt. aware that Japan has built tsunami walls (see attached picture) in the ocean because tsunami’s recur (caused as they are recurring tectonic (lateral and vertical) movements in earth crust)? Why hasn’t the Govt. publicised the tsunami protection measures of this type as part of disaster management? This is critical to inform the people and involve the communities to be ready to face the impending disaster.
  2. Why hasn’t the Government publicized the scientific 3D or modelling studies and investigations using satellite images of Cartosat or other aerial methods of surveillance and why hasn’t the Government responded publicly to the Nature magazine report?
  3. Has the Parliament been taken into confidence about the scientific investigations following the Nature magazine report which should have sent alarm bells ringing all along the long coastline of Bharatam and among the entire scientific, management, public service and engineering community?
  4. Has the Govt. studied and responded to the geothermal, geotectonic and geothermal situation in Setusamudram, aspects which were NOT taken into account while designing the project disaster called the Setu mid-ocean channel passage, an enterprise unprecedented in the annals of human civilization? Can the Govt. name one such operational mid-ocean channel?
  5. Why hasn’t the Govt. made public the scientific and other investigation reports and over 8000 pages of evidence/public opinions submitted to the so-called Baalu Committee (or Eminent Persons Committee on SSCP)?
  6. Why was the 2005 report of the consultant of National Institute of Ocean Technology which stated that there are indications of ancient human activity on Rama Setu and that it was a man-made construction doctored by Dept. of Earth Sciences, while responding to the request for information of His Excellency the President of India Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam?
  7. If Govt. has already done studies pursuant to the Nature magazine warning, why were they not published so that people are kept informed of the Govt. efforts to cope with the next, oncoming tsunami?
  8. Is the Govt. aware that the project area is evidenced by mannar volcanic rocks and that this is a hotspot with thermal springs and potential for generation of thermal electric power?
  9. What do the Govt. simulation studies indicate on the status of the world’s nuclear resource zone (the coastal zone 100 kms. from Rama Setu accounting for 32% of the world’s reserves of thorium)?
  10. What action has Govt. taken to remove the private sand godowns which have come up exporting monazite, ilmenite, rutile, zircon, garnet sands containing thorium and titanium?
  11. What plans are proposed to safeguard the nation’s wealth of these mineral resources vital for the nation’s energy independence programme based on stage 3 thorium-based breeder reactors?

It is great indeed to talk science. But then, we have to accept the reality that on an issue like this related to an ecological project disaster which adversely impacts the coastal/marine people is a peoples’ concern and scientists have a moral responsibility to show compassion to peoples’ lives and coastal peoples’ livelihood concerns and not parrot scientific half-truths indulging in suggestio falsi and suppressio veri without taking into account the multi-dimensional aspects involved such as oceanography, naval security, nautical/maritime options, law of the sea, protection of the ecosphere and of course, the lives and property of the long coastline of 8118 kms. of Bharat. This ain’t no issue to be flippantly dismissed as someone’s dream. This is a question related to national sovereignty, national integrity and national security. Why haven’t alternatives of Marine Economic Zone discussed and presented by scientists and policy makers to remedy a bad dream? Such an MEZ has the potential to make the nation realize Rs. 40,000 crores of foreign exchange earnings per annum by export of marine products (considering the five-fold increase in fish landings in the Indian Ocean ) of which Rs. 10,000 crores will relate to Tamilnadu coastal/marine zone. Juxtapose this against the paltry anticipated income of Rs. 200 crores from SSCP. These numbers and the economic viability of the project itself are doubtful of achievement, if the annual expenses of Indian Navy to guard the proposed channel are taken into account. These costs may completely negate the anticipated returns and render the unprecedented mid-ocean channel passage a perpetual sick unit from day one in the stormy cyclones and tsunamis of the Palk Straits.

Dr. S. Kalyanaraman

Former Sr. Exec., Asian Development Bank, Chennai

Kalyan97@gmail.com

17 Feb. 2008

On Feb 11, 2008 4:52 PM, Dr. P.S. Goel <dodsec-dod@nic.in> wrote:

Dear Dr. Kalyanararaman,

            I have seen your e-mail dated 6th February, 2008 today as I was away on tour.  I am not reacting to your remarks which are unfortunately not in good spirit.  Let us talk Science.

1.                  My colleagues have done computer simulations with and without the Setu Samundran for the 2004 Tsunami.  We can do any specific study issuing the simulation models.   The model worked will for September 12, 2007 event.

2.                  We are doing vulnerable studies for the whole coast.  Quite a lot work has been done already.

3.                  We have an operational Tsunami Warning System at Hyderabad.  It has been acclaimed as the best by Tsunami Experts from IOC/ICG a UN Body.

4.                  We are monitoring all the low and high seismic activities in the region in real time.  We are also monitoring tide gauges data on continuous basis at more than 25 locations on Indian coast.  So, it is possible for us to analyse sea water changes very precisely.

However, it is not my wish to get engaged in arguments and bringing non scientific issues. If you feel we need to address scientifically, please feel free to contact.

           

With  regards,

Yours sincerely,

(P.S. Goel)

—– Original Message —–
From: kalyan97 <kalyan97@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 6:44 pm
Subject: Fwd: Rama Setu: politicking by Hon’ble TR Baalu and Dr. PS Goel
To: secretary@moes.gov.in, dodsec-dod@nic.in, dodsec-dod@nic.in, kapilsibal@hotmail.com>
Here’s a geologist’s comment for your consideration.
> Thanks. kalyan>
>

———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: Gopalakrishnan Kuppuswamy <k_gopalakrish@yahoo.com>
> Date: Feb 7, 2008 6:30 PM
>
>
>
>
> Respected Dr. Kalyana Raman,>                                                The article in “Nature” magazine and the remarks of Dr. Tad S, Murthy pertain to large scale tsunamis. Such tsunamis are generated due to high Magnitude earthquakes generated at the Active Plate Margins of the earth with thrust faulting as the one near Sumatra. as well as due to some major volcanic eruptions as has happenened during the eruption of Krakatau volcano in Indonasia in 1883. The author of the article in Nature and Dr, Murthy warn against the surge of water through the linear narrow SSCP channael with added force during the next Tsuanami to cause vast devastations. Dr. Goel appears to have not understood this point.>
>  > Besides, Dr. Goel is probabble unaware of the formation of local tsunamis ans mini-tunamis that are produced due to normal faulting accompanied by moderate to high magnitude earthquakes. The SSCP project is riddled with such fault movements and moderate to high magnitude earthquakes, and the resultant local / mini-tsunamis are manifested in the form of frequent withdrawal of sea in some sectors and incursion of sea in other sectors This phenomenon is repeated frequently along the Tamil Nadu coast in the recent times. Such withdrawals of sea are reported in Tiruchendur and Rameswaram. Most recently, high tidal waves destroyed the fishing villages in North Madras. Although it was attributed to the major cyclne Cidr, it is pertinent to note that there was no cloud cover or rain in Chennai during that day as well as no high winds blowing along Chennai coast, although the cyclone was reported to move with speed of over 150 to 200 km/hour. Such activities are the result of mini-tsunamis. Such faulting accompanied by mini-tsunamis will not only affect and destroy the coastl areas, but also the shipping canal itself and filli it with additional sedimentation resulting in blockagae of the sea passage.These aspeects have to be studied thoroughly by various modeling studies.>
> K.Gopalakrishnan
>
Dr. P.S. Goel
Secretary to the Government of India
Ministry of Earth Sciences
‘Mahasagar’ Bhawan, Block-12
C.G.O. Complex, Lodi Road
New Delhi – 110 003
INDIATel: +91 11 24360874/24362548/24306801
Fax: +91 11 24362644/24360336
E-mail: secretary@moes.gov.in, dodsec@dod.delhi.nic.in
Web: http://moes.gov.in

Setu channel a white elephant

February 16, 2008

Setu channel a white elephant http://kalyan98.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/setu-project-unscientific-capt-h-balakrishnan/  The Coastal Action Network and Capt. H. Balakrishnan should be complimented for highlighting the environmental and national security disasters which the Setu Project creates. The security aspects will result in enormous annual expenditures by the Navy and the Coast Guard to guard the contemplated mid-ocean channel passage called Setu channel. These costs will render the Setu project economically a white elephant; even the estimated Rs. 200 crores annual income from the channel will evaporate leaving the channel as a sick unit to he handled by present and future generations. Kalyanaraman ‘Sethu project unscientific’ NT Bureau | Sat, 16 Feb, 2008,02:28 PMA retired Naval Officer and Master Mariner for the Merchant Navy H Balakrishnan on Saturday said the implementation of the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP) was unscientific and would also pose a threat to country’s national security as maritime terrorism and sea piracy were getting inter-mingled.Balakrishnan who has 32 years of experience at sea, endorsed Coast Guard DG Vice Admiral Rusi Contractor’s recent remarks that the project pose a threat to national security.‘Contractor is correct. I also analysed it. The project will pose a threat to national security as there is a piracy threat from Sudan, Straits of Malacca and South China sea’, he added.Quoting views of security experts, he said maritime terrorism and piracy were getting intermingled and going by the world report the global ransom rate per ship is one lakh US dollars.Referring to the installation of the underwater sea mines by the Lankan government between Katchatheevu and Neduntheevu, he said it was to prevent Sea Tigers, the marine wing of the LTTE, from entering the Island Nation.‘SSCP is an open channel and there is always a possibility of LTTE setting up sea mines, which is much cheaper when compared to acquiring surface-to-surface missiles. It’s enough if just one ship explodes’, Balakrishnan said. Observing that LTTE factor had a direct bearing on the safety of shipping navigation through the SSCP, he said the outfit had control over most of North Sri Lanka coastal region.On the economic aspect, the Naval Officer said a ship would incur a loss of Rs 19.4 lakh for a voyage between Kolkata and Tuticorin via SSCP.Similarly a ship will lose about US $ 60,000 for a voyage between Eden and Singapore. ‘One cannot justify an expenditure to the tune of Rs 2400 crore for a meagre time- saving move’, he said.Scientists and experts who took part in the meet called upon the Centre to table a comprehensive and transparent White Paper on Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project in Parliament giving full facts on the economic viability, environmental and ecological sustainability and engineering feasibility of the project. http://newstodaynet.com/newsindex.php?id=5043%20&%20section=7 Experts Ask Government To Come Clean On Sethusamudram  Saturday 16th of February 2008 (India Post) Scientists and experts at a meet organised here Saturday urged the central government to table a white paper in parliament on the ‘economic viability, environmental and ecological sustainability, engineering feasibility and ethical tenability’ of the controversial Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP). The meet organised by the Coastal Action Network, an umbrella group for 7,000 villages and fishing federations in Tamil Nadu’s 1,000 km long coastline, also questioned the security risk of such a canal project. The project, started by the union government in 2005, involves dredging a 20-km long, 300-meter wide and 10.7 meter deep channel between the Gulf of Mannar and the Palk Bay, through Adam’s Bridge at a cost of Rs.2400 billion ($600 million). The government estimates that nearly 3,000 ships will use the channel every year to cut short the travelling distance between Chennai port and Kanya Kumari (Cape Comorin) to 402 nautical miles from the present 755 nautical miles.  Retired naval officer and Master Mariner for merchant navy H. Balakrishnan said: ‘The SSCP is an open channel and there is a possibility of the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam) setting up sea mines, which is much cheaper when compared to acquiring surface-to-surface missiles. It’s enough if just one ship explodes.’ Balakrishnan endorsed Coast Guard Director General Vice-Admiral Rusi Contractor’s recent remarks that the project ‘poses a threat to the national security’. ‘Contractor is correct. I also analysed it. The project will pose a threat to national security as there is a piracy threat from Sudan to Straits of Malacca and to South China Sea,’ Balakrishnan added. The LTTE had ‘a direct bearing on the safety of shipping navigation through the SSCP,’ he said, pointing out that the LTTE had control over most of north Sri Lanka coast. ‘The global ransom rate for one ship today was $100,000,’ he said, adding, ‘Tigers have displayed considerable ingenuity and daring act in sea-borne insurgency’. The Sri Lanka government has installed mines between Kachchatheevu and Neduntheevu, under water to prevent Sea Tigers, the marine wing of the LTTE, from crossing into international waters, he said. Mired in religious and environment controversies, the cost of the project has escalated to Rs.35 billion and the Supreme Court has stayed the project amid speculation that the government is unwilling to continue with it. http://newspostindia.com/report-37628 Sethu security threat: Expert Chennai, Feb. 16 (Deccan Chronicle 17 Feb. 2008): Retired naval captain H. Balakrishnan on Saturday said the implementation of the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP) would pose a threat to the country’s national security as maritime terrorism and sea piracy were getting inter-mingled.   Speaking to reporters at a press conference organised by the Coastal Action Network, Mr Balakrishnan, who has three decades of experience at sea, endorsed the recent remarks by Coast Guard vice-admiral Rusi Contractor that the shipping canal project on completion would pose a threat to national security.  On the economic aspect, the retired naval officer said a ship would incur a loss of Rs 19.4 lakh for a trip between Kolkata and Tuticorin via SSCP. Similarly a ship will lose about US $ 60,000 for a voyage between Eden and Singapore. “One cannot justify an expenditure to the tune of Rs 2,400 crore for a time-saving measure,” Mr. Balakrishnan said.  The canal is likely to encourage only vessels with a carrying capacity of about 30,000 tonnes, but currently the merchant ships are handling a cargo of more than 60,000 tonnes. And oil ships, whose volume is high, will also avoid  SSCP, he pointed out. Further, SSCP is an open channel and there is always a  possibility of  the LTTE setting up sea mines. He also emphasised that the LTTE factor had a direct bearing on the safety of shipping navigation through SSCP. The banned outfit had control over most of the coastal waters of North Sri Lanka, he added.

http://www.deccan.com/chennaichronicle/City/Citynews.asp#Sethu security threat: Expert

Setu project: Baalu not ready to wait for archaeological survey

February 15, 2008

Baalu not ready to wait for Sethusamudram survey

New Delhi (PTI): The Shipping Ministry has decided to go ahead with the Sethusamudram project without waiting for an archaeological survey even as differences within the government on the issue persist.

At a meeting of the Group of Ministers, Shipping Minister T R Baalu is understood to have pressed for giving the controversial project the green signal without waiting for the survey as favoured by the Culture Ministry. 

Culture Minister Ambika Soni is in favour of a detailed archaeological survey as per international norms before taking any decision on the project which is being opposed by Hindu groups.

The Supreme Court on January 31 granted another four weeks extention to the Centre to file affidavits related to the Sethusamudram project.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan accepted the request of Additional Solicitor-General R Mohan that the two-weeks’ time granted to the Centre on Janaury 16 to file the affidavits be extended by four weeks and posted the matter for hearing in the first week of March.

Due to differences, the GoM constituted to finalise Centre’s stand on the project could not reach any conclusion.

Besides Soni and Baalu, the GoM is comprised of Science and Technology Minister Kapil Sibal and Law Minister HR Bhardwaj.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/002200802152225.htm

Rama Setu: Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha resolutions, Feb. 2008

February 15, 2008

Resolutions passed in the third Conference of the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha, held in Sri Adichunchanagiri( near Bangalore) on February 9-11, 2008

This third Conference of the Acharya Sabha was held in the ancient Sri Adi Chunchanagiri Matha during February 9 to 11, 2008. The Acharya members present heard the Secretary’s report and the Convener’s observations. With that background, the Acharya Sabha deliberated on a variety of topics of concern and interest to Hindus world-wide and in India in particular. The substance of the deliberations and conclusions appears in the brief Statement below. It is followed by the Resolutions passed on individual topics in the Agenda considered by the Acharya Sabha.

Statement.

  1. There is an increasing awareness among the Acharya leadership, of the seriousness of Hindu concerns and causes which are not addressed or insufficiently addressed by authorities and within Indian Society; some of the Acharyas have taken the initiative to project the grievances of Hinduism and Hindus in specific cases; many have lent their hand and support to collective action to highlight Hindu sensitivities and grievances;
  2. Awareness of unjust treatment of Hindus in the country under the flawed concept of secularism, has increased considerably overseas; such awareness is providing support to Hindu awareness among the masses in India;
  3. The State Government of Tamil Nadu has in callous disregard of Hindu sentiments pursued the ill-considered Sethusamudram project despite repeated representations from numerous experts and members of the public and also from the Acharya Sabha; the Government of India has also not been sensitive to the sacred resonance of ‘Rama Setu’ in the hearts of millions of Hindus all over the world, in persisting with the dredging of the narrow sea between Sri Lanka and India along an alignment that will damage the ‘Rama Setu’ irretrievably. The Acharya Sabha therefore fully supports the country-wide agitation in the matter, appreciates the scholarly documentation that was put together and the legal action mounted.
  4. Several Hindu organizations in the country are becoming active and proactive in the field to counter adverse propaganda against Hindu society and Dharma, to oppose conversion and violence and to highlight Hindu sensitivities;
  5. More and more subtle attempts are underway outside the country to ‘appropriate’ Hindu philosophy and practices( such as Yoga, meditation, Sanskrit language and even sacred scriptures such as Bhagavad Gita), detaching them from their Hindu identity;
  6. Global warming resulting in the rapid receding of glaciers that feed the great Indian rivers, is a major threat to the world and particularly to India; sustained efforts are needed by several authorities to stem this adverse tide; the Hindu religious leadership must explain to the devotee masses how Hindu heritage strongly opposes reckless consumption and supports conservation of and respect to all forms of life;
  7. Many ancient Mathas and temples in the country are in need of rejuvenation; these institutions have a major role in sustaining, teaching and strengthening Hindu Dharma; Mathatipatis must nominate their successors before it becomes too late to do so; otherwise another pretext becomes available for government to interfere in these Hindu institutions;
  8. The Acharya Sabha re-pledges itself, in the aforementioned context to speak in a single united voice, act in a concerted manner to implement specific action plans drawn up from time to time, to strengthen Hindu Dharma and Society, and counter the problems and threats they face. In this context, a lot more needs to be done by individual Acharyas in their tours, Pravachans and among their vast devotee populations in: raising Hindu self esteem; resisting and preventing conversion by protagonists of other religions; refusing to be cowed down by threats of violence from any quarter; taking recourse to legal action in specific cases aimed at protecting Hindu interests at large;
  9. Individual Acharya members should consider and project the activities of their Mathas and Peethas as an effort to implement the Resolutions of the Acharya Sabha.

In the light of the foregoing, the Acharya Sabha passes the following Resolutions and calls for their vigorous implementation both by individual Acharya members, sannyasis, Hindu activists and the secretariat of the Acharya Sabha.

Temple governance matters.

Noting that

· in Andhra Pradesh, a High Court Stay was in force on acquisition of temple lands for any purpose till writ petitions filed in that regard are finally disposed off;

· In Andhra Pradesh, certain amendments have been made to the Endowment Act, the primary purpose of which is to reduce the work load on the government department and to release very small temples with little or no income into the hands of individual archakas for implementing daily pujas with the help of govt. subvention/devotee offerings;

· in Karnataka, a high powered committee has submitted recommendations for a new Endowment Law after the High Court struck down the earlier ones on certain grounds not necessarily recognizing Hindu concerns in matters of temple governance;

· in Kerala, in a Writ filed with the help of the Acharya Sabha Trust, the High Court conceded a peripheral point regarding oath-administration, but did not favour any basic concern of Hindu Society as a whole in temple matters;

· in Madhya Pradesh a new Law is under consideration in respect of temples but it seeks to retains all control in a series of government nominated bodies and in the hands of the government itself;

· in Himachal Pradesh and in Uttarakhand new governments have taken over;

· the alarming tendency in governments, both Central and the State, to treat temples and places of sacred importance to Hindus as tourist attraction particularly for foreign tourism which detracts from their sacred value to Hindus;

· there have been many terrorist attacks on Hindu places of worship in the country, and the perpetrators have not been brought to book; and

· the need for local Hindu communities to gather experience in governing temples of different sizes and popularity among temple-worshipping devotees; and thereby for establishing the credibility of the claim that they are capable of managing their places of worship, efficiently, transparently and in an accountable manner.

It is hereby resolved that

· active recourse must be taken to concerted legal action and for this purpose legal cells may be identified and created in different States and at Delhi;

· a Legal Action Fund may be created in the Acharya Sabha Trust to which individual Acharya may contribute liberally;

· rapport may be established with the new governments in Himachal Pradesh and in Uttarakhand to explore the possibility of some salutary changes in the manner of temple governance;

· correspondence may be initiated with the Chief Ministers and the Tourism Minister of Govt. of India on the need to safeguard the sanctity of temples and other places of sacred importance to Hindus; this may be followed up with visits on behalf of the Acharya Sabha, to the ministers;

· representations may be addressed to appropriate authorities deploring increasing terrorist threats to and attacks on Hindu places of worship and demanding strong preventive and punitive action;

· temple committees comprising local temple-worshipping communities should be set up as a part and parcel of Dharma Rakshana Samitis (decided at the last Conference at Mumbai) as a measure of education in transparent and accountable management, harmonious local participation in such management and demonstrable credibility for self-management of places of Hindu worship. Individual Acharyas are exhorted to undertake this exercise within their Sampradayas and area of Matha/Peetha influence.

Temple –entry matters.

Noting that

· while long-held local traditions in regard to some restrictions on entering temples, can not be easily and abruptly brushed aside, it is necessary to take steps which contribute to reducing and eliminating divisiveness within Hindu Society and to thwart forces that stand to benefit by such divisiveness;

· it is necessary to distinguish between idle curiosity that brings some people to wander into temples and genuine visitors who want to observe and learn about temples and the time-honored customs of worship in them.

It is hereby resolved that

· it is necessary to follow all reasonable laws of the land , both in letter and spirit, in restricting entry in to temples and other places sacred to Hindus;

· it is not incorrect, however, to prevent or restrict entry of non-devotees and mere curiosity-seeking tourists, particularly improperly clad or groomed tourists and visitors including such persons from overseas;

· the basic approach in specific cases must be to harmonize local traditions gradually with the expectations of temple-worshipping Hindu devotees and to respect contemporary standards of equity and equality;

· in the event of necessity to restrain individuals from entering temples, the matter should be cordially explained to them; special care must be taken to see that sevadars and pujaris are not offensive or rude to them; and

· none except authorized religious personnel should be allowed to enter the Garbhagriha, which is a specially sanctified place in a temple.

Whom to consider as a Hindu and what distinguishes Sanaatana Dharma (Hinduism).

Noting that

· unlike in other religious persuasions it is not possible to straitjacket a Hindu and Hinduism exclusively in any set of practices, rituals or taboos;

· Hinduism should not be viewed only through the prism of what is construed as ‘religion’ by non-Hindus;

· various differing Sampradayas of ancient lineage with diverse interpretations and understandings of ancient scriptural teachings such as Vedas with all the Upanishads, Bhagawad Gita etc constitute Sanaatana Dharma( Hinduism) and are all integral to Hinduism;

· not-withstanding the foregoing it is necessary to compile a set of simple guiding principles with which modern youth, Ghar Vapasi families, and those outside Hindu Dharma, can obtain a basic understanding of Hinduism; and

· Bhagawad Gita contains a comprehensive code of Dharma, which could be followed by all human beings for a morally upright, happy and productive life.

It is hereby resolved that

· a compilation may be prepared as a practical guide to distinguish a Hindu and Hinduism, with the understanding that it should be taken only as a starting point for a deeper study by a serious seeker, of several authentic interpretations and of the chosen Sampradaya; and

· the idea that Bhagawad Gita merits acceptance as the National Book of India, is worthy of promotion.

Reconversion(Ghar Vapasi issues).

Noting that

· more and more families seem to be interested in returning to their own traditions of faith and worship, realizing the disruption and discord that religious conversion is creating in their communities;

· assistance to such ‘returnees’—Ghar Vapasi families–is resented by individuals and entities engaged in conversion activities, and therefore attempts will increase to throw doubts on and discredit re-conversion;

· after re-conversion, families face intimidation by hostile forces and will, therefore, need sustained efforts at re-absorption in their local communities.

It is hereby resolved that

· every Acharya member is hereby authorized and empowered on behalf of the Acharya Sabha , to encourage, undertake freely and bless all voluntary and genuine re-conversions to Hindu Dharma;

· Such blessing may be accompanied by a simple sanctification ceremony, chosen by the Acharya for the re-converting families/individuals; they may be given simple Hindu names by which they will be called and known to authorities henceforth; as a mark of re-conversion they may be blessed with a copy of the Bhagavad Gita or a small pendant with a god/goddess of the family’s choice or any other such religious symbol;

· Acharya members should in their tours and pravachans emphasize that such returning individuals/families must be readily accepted socially and get connected through marriage etc ( “roti-beti sambhanda”);

· Acharya members may grant privileged darsanam, singly or collectively, to such Ghar Vapasi individuals/families in their field tours and in their Mathas/Peethas; this gesture will be valued greatly by the returning individuals/families;

· The reconverting individuals/families should be free to choose their ancestral caste identity if known and preferred; if not, this may be left to themselves and the village community to be settled amicably; in doing so, any special economic benefit that may be available under law or government schemes, should be kept in mind so that the returnees benefit accordingly;

· It is essential that suitable documentation should precede and follow any Ghar Vapasi program; they are: (1) an application for voluntary re-conversion; (2) an affidavit to be sworn by the voluntary re-convert; and (3) a Report to the District Authorities of the Government (sub divisional magistrate/District Collector or any other official prescribed by the State government concerned) intimating of such voluntary re-conversion with the new name(s). The documentation should be as shown in the attachment to this Resolution; and

· Special care must be taken, with the help of devotees of the Acharya Sabha member, to see that the reconverted individual/family is not subsequently intimidated or lured/enticed by evangelists or their agents, or authorities misled, about such re-conversion with a view to bring ill-repute or harm to such Ghar Vapasis. This follow-up action may need frequent visit to, or even stationing of an activist in, the village/ community for a while.

Distortion and Denigration of Hinduism by academicians.

Noting that

· for several years now some Western academics, particularly in some American Universities have been publishing articles, PhD theses and books, purporting to interpret and analyze Hinduism, Hindu deities and worship practices;

· some of these works are extremely ill-informed or purposely distorted; they do not meet the rigorous standards of scholarship nor do they undergo competent peer-review; they denigrate things sacred to Hindus;

· these works do not remain within scholarly circles but find their way as recommended readings in schools and colleges in the US; besides giving a completely wrong picture of what is Hinduism and what their deities stand for, they impact the young minds of Hindu children and young adults in a deeply injurious manner—destroying their self esteem and pride in their own tradition and cultural roots;

· TV media in India is dominated by non-Hindu interests, pseudo-secularists and Abrahamic religious leadership/institutions; the result is that Hindu youth does not get a correct picture of what Hinduism is and what is its stand on many contemporary issues amidst virulent propaganda against Hindu Dharma; and

· under the deeply flawed notion of what secularism means, school and college curricula avoid any serious Religious studies in the country in an academic setting; this affects Hindu thought particularly.

It is hereby resolved that

· the book, Invading the Sacred, which exposes in a scholarly setting these developments should be widely distributed to encourage large-scale readership; an adapted Summary version in different languages should be put out in the country and liberally distributed;

· till such time a full blown Acharya Sabha TV Channel becomes a reality, Acharyas may buy time-slots in the existing regional and national TV Channels ( Sanskar; Astha; Vishwa Dharisanam, and several such regional language channels) for expertly designed programs; they should comprise not only pravachans on Hindu scriptural and Puranic wisdom but also lectures by Hindu scholars in various professions, debates on contemporary Hindu concerns and issues with a view to countering false propaganda by vested interests and uninformed criticism of Hindu Dharma, and to convey authentic information to youth about Hinduism’s stand on several contemporary social issues. Some important examples are the problem of global warming and how families could contribute to mitigating the adverse effects, child and women welfare, labor welfare, moderating competition in business with compassion and Seva for the underprivileged;

· efforts must be mounted to install departments and curricula of Religious Studies in educational institutions in different States; and well-educated and academically inclined brahmacharis and brahmacharinis should be identified by individual Acharyas and encouraged with financial support to undertake higher studies and PhD programs in civilization/culture/ religion-related subjects; such studies should also be encouraged to develop and clarify Hindu position on a variety of contemporary issues such as human rights, child labour, women welfare, labour welfare, good governance, legal and penal controversies, poverty eradication, sociology, Hindu history, anthropology, medicine, archaeology, architecture etc; and

· colonial constructs and colonized mind- set must be exposed in an academic setting, and in media-debates, journals and in scholarly publications, for which financial and other forms of support should be extended by Acharyas and their well-to-do devotees.

Dharma Index of the Oxford Center for Hindu Studies

Noting that

· the Oxford Center for Hindu Studies as a Consultant to some private companies including the Dow Jones of the US, had proposed and spearheaded the institution of a “Dharma Index” to ‘grade’ Industry and Business (and enterprises) as a guide to investors and businessmen/entrepreneurs;

· in doing so, the Center, on the basis of advice tendered by a group of academics overseas selected by it, has chosen ‘Ahimsa’, construed as ‘non-violence’ and ‘Loka-samgraha’, understood as ‘responsible action for universal welfare’ as guiding moral principles for such grading;

· on being requested by the Center to be a member of ‘spiritual leaders’ to ‘bless’ the Index, the Convener of the Acharya Sabha got the matter studied in consultation with the Director of the Center ; and the former came to the conclusion that the concept and operational modalities of the Index, needed more collective in-depth thinking by Business and Finance experts as well as Dharmic individuals sufficiently knowledgeable in lived Dharma; and that launching the Index without more thought might lead to consequences that may not be happy for those who choose to be guided by the Index; accordingly the Convener had written to the Center, a copy of which was circulated to the members of the Acharya Sabha;

· the Center had also, reportedly, approached directly a few Acharya members( HH Yatindra Mahadesikan of Ahobila Matha; HH Ramanuja Jeer of Vanamamalai math; HH Pejawar Swamigal; HH Pramukh Swamigal of Swaminarayana and Hh Kanchi Sankaracharya); the Convener accordingly apprised them of the stand taken by the Convener on behalf of the Acharya Sabha; and

· the Center notwithstanding the above had gone ahead and launched the so-called “Dharma Index”.

It is hereby resolved that

· individual Acharyas mentioned above and any other Acharya member who may be approached may kindly keep in mind the foregoing developments in mind; they may advise the Oxford Center that the association of members of the Acharya Sabha in a spiritual group or for ‘blessing’ the Index should be preceded by more careful examination of the concept and the consequences of the implementation of the Index.

· a Media Note may be circulated by the Convener accordingly.

Preservation of ancient Hindu heritage documents

Noting that

· a very large number of Hindu heritage manuscripts and other material are in the possession of individuals, religious institutions including Mathas and Peethas and they require proper scientific conservation, preservation for posterity, cataloguing etc by experts;

· around a million of such treasures of our heritage are reported to have been identified and a large number, digitalized with the help of the manuscript depositories all over the country;

· the National Mission for Manuscripts has identified 45 manuscripts to be included, as first instalment in a “Vigyananidhi” ;

· the University of Karnataka and an American company were to collaborate in digitalizing about a lakh of such manuscripts in diverse fields of knowledge; and the Union Ministry of Culture and the National Mission for manuscripts were also engaged in similar activities; and

· abrahamic religious institutions are more organized and tightly controlled to ensure scientific conservation of their heritage documents, their preservation by digitalization for posterity and their wide availability for research.

It is hereby Resolved that

· individual Acharyas may get this matter examined with reference to precious heritage manuscripts and other material that may be in their possession or their Mathas/Peethas or in the possession of their devotees and contribute actively to their location, identification, decipherment, evaluation, cataloguing, conservation and preservation by digitalization for posterity of all such heritage material.;

· in doing so, care must be taken that foreign agencies do not acquire ownership or management rights over our Heritage material;

· any assistance that may be required in this regard may be given by the Convener and the Secretariat.

Functioning of Regional Committees and the Emergency Committee of Acharyas

Noting that

· the regional Committees and the Emergency Committee nominated at the time of the last Acharya Sabha Conference have not been actively functional; and

· their active functioning is important considering the difficulty of convening the Acharya Sabha too often or for specific purposes as and when they arise;

It is hereby resolved that

· these committees may be activated by the convener Acharya members and kept active in respect of problems as and when they arise and the Secretariat may provide all assistance in this regard; and

· he socio-economic Seva and Ghar Vapasi work experience of Acharyas in their regions may be shared with other Acharya members for mutual benefit. The Secretariat should facilitate such mutual exchange of experience.

The Sabha concluded with the resolve that in the next Conference, each Acharya member may present to the Sabha as whole, the initiatives and work programs undertaken by his Matha/Peetha in the period after the present Conference.

February 13, 2008

Setu project: Ambika Soni walks out of GoM meet

February 15, 2008

Setu project: Ambika Soni walks out of GoM meet 

Daily Thanthi, Tamil daily, Feb. 15, 2008

ÚN‰ N˜†‡W ‡yP ‘WopÛ]:
U‹‡¡L· iyP†‡¥ A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ ÙY¸SP“

“‰ÙP¥¦, ‘.15-
ÚN‰ N˜†‡W ‡yP ‘WopÛ] T¼½ SÛPÙT¼\ U‹‡¡L· iyP†‡¥ C£‹‰ U‹‡¡ A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ ÙY¸SP“ ÙNšRÖŸ.

U‹‡¡L· iyP•

ÚN‰ N˜†‡W LÖ¥YÖš ‡yP†ÛR G‡Ÿ†‰ r¢• ÚLÖŸyz¥ YZeh ÙRÖPWTyP‰. C‘WopÛ]›¥ ÚLÖŸyz¥ RÖeL¥ ÙNšYR¼LÖ] T‡¥ UÄÛY U†‡V AWr RVÖ¡†‰ E·[‰.

C‹R UÄ T¼½ U†‡V U‹‡¡L· hµ ÚS¼¿ ÙP¥¦›¥ iz BÚXÖNÛ] SP†‡V‰. C‡¥ ™†R U‹‡¡L· ‘WQ֐ ˜LŸÈ, AŸ^×Á pj, TW†YÖÇ, L‘¥ pT¥ BfÚVÖŸ TjÚL¼\]Ÿ. U†‡V RÛW Y³ U¼¿• LT¥ ÚTÖehYW†‰ U‹‡¡ z.BŸ.TÖ¨, r¼¿XÖ U¼¿• LXÖNÖW ‰Û\ U‹‡¡ A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ BfÚVÖ£• LX‹‰ ÙLցP]Ÿ.

ÚUÖR¥

iyP†‡¥ ÚN‰ N˜†‡W ‡yP ‘WopÛ]›¥ r¢• ÚLÖŸyz¥ RÖeL¥ ÙNšYR¼LÖ] UÄ«¥ CP• ÙT¼½£eh• pX L£†‰eLºeh A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ ByÚNT• ÙR¡«†RÖŸ.

AÚTÖ‰ ÚN‰ N˜†‡W ‡yP†‰eh A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ RÛPeL¥XÖL C£TRÖL z.BŸ.TÖ¨ i½VRÖL°•, CÛR†ÙRÖPŸ‹‰ AY£eh•, A•‘LÖ ÚNÖÂeh• CÛPÚV L|• YÖehYÖR• SÛPÙT¼\RÖL°• ÙR¡f\‰.

A‹R ÚSW†‡¥ L‘¥pT¥ ÚTrÛL›¥; ÚN‰ N˜†‡W ‡yP• T¼½ A•‘LÖ ÚNÖÂeh G‰°• ÙR¡V«¥ÛX GÁ¿ h¼\• NÖyz]ÖŸ.

AÛR† ÙRÖPŸ‹‰ U‹‡¡L· CÛPÚV sPÖ] YÖehYÖR• SÛPÙT¼\‰. AÚTÖ‰ A•‘LÖ ÚNÖÂeh BRWYÖL VÖ£• ÚTN«¥ÛX.

ÙY¸SP“

C‰ AY£eh ÚU¨• ÚLÖT†ÛR H¼T|†‡V‰. EPÚ] U‹‡¡L· iyP†‡¥ C£‹‰ AYŸ BÚYN†‰PÁ ÙY¸SP“ ÙNšRÖŸ. AYŸ ÚSWÖL ®y|eh “\Ty| ÚTÖš «yPÖŸ.

™†R U‹‡¡VÖ] ‘WQ֐ ˜LŸÈ CÛRe L| A‡Ÿop AÛP‹RÖŸ. EPÚ] AYŸ, A•‘LÖ ÚNÖÂÛV NUÖRÖ]T|†‰YR¼LÖL ÚTÖÂ¥ ÙRÖPŸ“ ÙLց| ÚTp]ÖŸ.

B]Ö¥, A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ NUÖRÖ]• AÛPV«¥ÛX. U‹‡¡L· iyP†‡¥ RÁÛ] AYU‡†‰ «yPRÖL AYŸ ÙR¡«†RÖŸ.

‘WRU£eh LzR•

C‹ŒÛX›¥ U‹‡¡L· iyP†‡¥ SP‹R N•TY• T¼½ ‘WRU£eh A•‘LÖ ÚNÖ LzR• GµR E·[ÖŸ.

http://dailythanthi.com/article.asp?NewsID=393501&disdate=2/15/2008&advt=1

http://www.dailythanthi.com/thanthiepaper/showxml.aspx?id=5484894&code=2869

Translation from Daily Thanthi, Tamil daily of 15 Feb. 2008
Setu project issue: Ambika Soni walks out of Group of Ministers’ Meeting
New Delhi, Feb. 15.
Ambika Soni, Union Minister for Culture, walked out of the Group of Ministers’ Meeting held to discuss Setu project issue.
Ministers’ Meeting
A litigation is pending in the Supreme Court about Setu Channel project. Centre has prepared an affidavit to be submitted to the Court.
Yesterday, a Group of Ministers’ meeting was held to discuss this affidavit. In this meeting, senior ministers, Pranab Mukherjee, Arjun Singh, Bharadwaj, Kapil Sibal participated. Shipping Minister TR Baalu and Culture Minister Ambika Soni also participated.
Fight
In the meeting, Ambika Soni objected to some points made in the affidavit proposed for submission to the Court.
It is reported that then TR Baalu said that Ambika Soni is a hindrance to the Setu project and it is learnt that an exchange of words took place between TR Baalu and Ambika Soni.
Then, Kapil Sibal is reported to have said that Ambika Soni does not know anything about the Setu project.
Following this, there were altercations among the Ministers. Then, no one spoke in support of Ambika Soni.
Walk out
This angered her even more. Immediately, she walked out of the meeting in anger. She straightaway returned home.
Senior minister Pranab Mukherjee was shocked by this. To pacify Ambika Soni, he spoke to her on phone.
But, Ambika Soni was not pacified. She said that she was humiliated in the ministers’ meet.
Letter to PM
In this situation, Ambika Soni has written a letter to Prime Minister about the incidents which occurred in the Group of Ministers’ Meeting.

Setu project: beware of LTTE, says Lankan Navy chief

February 14, 2008

Sethu project: Beware of LTTE, says Lankan Navy chief
Friday February 15 2008 00:00 IST

NEW DELHI: Sri Lankan Navy chief Vice Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda on Thursday sought international cooperation to deal with the threat posed by the LTTE and claimed that patrolling would have to be increased if India’s Sethusamundram shipping channel project is implemented.
Wasantha Karannagoda, who is in New Delhi to take part in Indian Ocean Naval Symposium, claimed that the LTTE has been a threat for Sri Lanka but if its activities were not checked the group will pose problems for other countries.
He said the Sri Lankan Navy has been successful in countering the LTTE. Welcoming the Indian Navy’s initiative to bring together sea forces of the Indian Ocean region, he said such a cooperation will help in forming a joint strategy to deal with threats posed by terrorists.
Karannagoda steered clear from the controversy over the Sethusamundram project but said that the Indian Government would have factored the security aspect while conceiving the shipping lane.
On its party, Sri Lanka will increase patrol on its side of the channel, he added. The Sri Lankan official said the bilateral cooperation between the maritime security agencies of the two countries was in place.
The two sides hold regular discussions to clear any misunderstanding. There are coordinated patrols to secure the area.

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEH20080214133114&Title=Top+Stories&Topic=0&

Rama Setu and oil: CBI ‘check’ for TR Baalu

February 14, 2008

http://epaper.dinamalar.com/ArticleImageEx.aspx?article=14_02_2008_010_017&type=1&mode=1dinamalar14feb2008teashop.jpg

CBI ‘check’ for TR Baalu (Dinamalar, 14 Feb. 2008 Edit page: Teashop Bench ‘teekkadaibenchu’)