Archive for December, 2007

Rama Setu: want to see Ramayana sites? Come to Srilanka !

December 25, 2007

Rama Setu: want to see Ramayana sites? Come to Srilanka !

Sri Lanka uses Ramayana to woo Indian tourists

By IANS

Wednesday December 19, 12:05 PM

Colombo, Dec 19 (IANS) Sri Lanka is going to use the Hindu epic Ramayana to attract Indian tourists in a big way.

The Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTDA) has formed a committee to work out an ambitious scheme to develop and promote as many as 34 sites in the island associated with the Ramayana,’ SLTDA chief S. Kalaiselvam said.

‘We want to get started on this soon,’ Kalaiselvam told IANS.

According to the Ramayana, Ravana brought Sita to Sri Lanka in a flying machine called ‘Pushpaka Vimanam’ by the Hindus and ‘Dandu Monara Yanthraya’ by the Sinhalese Buddhists.

This reportedly landed at Werangatota, about 10 km from Mahiyangana, east of the hill station of Nuwara Eliya in central Sri Lanka.

Sita was then taken to Goorulupota, now known as Sitakotuwa, where Ravana’s wife Mandodari lived. Seetakotuwa is about 10 km from Mahiyangana on the road to Kandy.

Sita was housed in a cave at Sita Eliya on a highway that links Colombo with Nuwara Eliya, another exotic hill station. A temple dedicated to her exists there.

Sita is believed to have bathed in the mountain stream flowing beside the temple.

These are not the only sites in Sri Lanka associated with the Ramayana.

North of Nuwara Eliya, in Matale district, is Yudhaganapitiya, where the Rama-Ravana battle reportedly took place.

According to a Sinhalese legend, Dunuwila is the place from where Rama shot the ‘Bramshira’ arrow (Brahmastra) that killed Ravana. Ravana was making battle plans in a place called Lakgala when the killer arrow struck him.

Lakgala is a rock from the top of which Ravana could see northern Sri Lanka clearly. It served as a watchtower following the expectation that Rama would invade the island to rescue his consort.

Ravana’s body was placed on the rock at Yahangala for his subjects to pay their last respects.

Since Ravana was a Brahmin, it was considered a sin to kill him, even in battle. To wash off the sin, Rama prayed at the Munneswaram temple in Chilaw, 80 km north of Colombo. At Manaweri, north of Chilaw, is a temple Rama is said to have gifted.

Rumassala and Ramboda, also in the tea-growing central highlands, are associated with Hanuman.

It is believed that Hanuman dropped the Dronagiri mountain, which he brought from the Himalayas, at Rumassala. At Ramboda, known for its massive waterfalls, a temple for Hanuman has now sprung up.

Legend has it that the Koneswaram temple, in the eastern district of Trincomalee, was a gift to Ravana from Lord Shiva because the former was an ardent devotee.

At the Buddha Vihara at Kelani, near Colombo, there is a representation of Rama handing over the ‘captured’ Sri Lanka to Ravana’s brother Vibheeshana, who sided with him in his conflict with Ravana.

The idea of using sites associated with the Ramayana was first mooted by a Kolkata-based businessman in the late 1990s. But the Sri Lankan press was not for it saying the country would be ‘invaded’ by Indians, spoiling the serene atmosphere of the Nuwara Eliya hills.

At that time, Sri Lanka was cultivating the high spending and sophisticated Western markets and not budget tourists from India. But very soon it was clear that Sri Lanka could not do without Indian tourists.

The preferred traffic from Britain and Germany tended to peter out with the escalation of the war in the island and terror bombings in Colombo. But Indian tourists came undeterred.

Soon, arrivals from India outstripped those from Britain and Germany, which were in the top slot.

Several Indian and Sri Lankan airlines now fly between the two countries. The official carrier Sri Lankan alone carried 1.1 million passengers to and from India during April 2006-March 2007. This was 32 percent of its global traffic.

It, therefore, makes sense to the Sri Lankan tourism authorities to build on the bonanza. And what would attract Indians to Sri Lanka more than the sites associated with the Ramayana?

http://in.news.yahoo.com/071219/43/6ome1.html

Sri Lanka to promote ‘Ramayana’ sites to attract tourists

Colombo (PTI): Tourists visiting Sri Lanka can now have a feel of the ‘Ramayana’ as the government has decided to develop the sites associated with the epic for which it has sought India’s assistance.

Hindu devout and those interested in mythology would get an opportunity to visit the sites in the island nation which the epic suggests was ruled by the great demon-king Ravana.

A team of Sri Lankan tourism department is now in India to resurrect and sequence with impeccable accuracy the revered epic.

“Our team is currently in India to study the project. We have sent our experts to seek assistance in India for developing the sites in Sri Lanka which once witnessed (events of) the historic Ramayana,” Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTD) chief S Kalaiselvam told PTI.

The tourism authorities are planning sound and light show, proper logistic facilities and other amenities at the sites to attract Indians and other tourists from world over but, Kalaiselvam said, nothing has been finalised yet.

“We have not yet decided on the knitty-gritty of the Ramayana site package,” he said.

According to the Ramayana, Ravana abducted Sita to Sri Lanka in a flying machine called “Pushpaka Vimanam” by the Hindus and “Dandu Monara Yanthraya” by the Sinhalese Buddhists.

Detailed documents prepared by the Sri Lankan Tourism Ministry said the “Pushpaka Vimanam” could have landed at Werangatota, about 10 km from Mahiyangana, east of the hill station of Nuwara Eliya in central Sri Lanka.

Sita was then taken to Goorulupota, now known as Sitakotuwa, where Ravana’s wife Mandodari lived. Seetakotuwa is about 10 km from Mahiyangana on the road to Kandy.

Sita was housed in a cave at Sita Eliya on a highway that links Colombo with Nuwara Eliya, another exotic hill station.

A temple dedicated to her exists there. According to the document, Sita is believed to have taken bath in the mountain stream flowing beside the temple.

These are not the only sites in Sri Lanka associated with the Ramayana, the Tourism Ministry document said.

North of Nuwara Eliya, in Matale district, is Yudhaganapitiya, where the Rama-Ravana battle took place.

According to a Sinhalese legend, Dunuwila is the place from where Rama shot the “Bramshira” arrow (Brahmastra) that killed Ravana. Ravana was making battle plans in a place called Lakgala when the killer arrow struck him.

Since Ravana was a Brahmin, it was considered a sin to kill him, even in battle. To wash off the sin, Rama prayed at the Munneswaram temple in Chilaw, 80 km north of Colombo.

Rumassala and Ramboda, also in the tea-growing central highlands, are associated with Hanuman. Believers say that Hanuman dropped the Dronagiri mountain, which he brought from the Himalayas, at Rumassala. At Ramboda, known for its massive waterfalls, a temple for Hanuman has now sprung up.

The documents state that at the Buddha Vihara at Kelani, near Colombo, there is a representation of Rama handing over the “captured” Sri Lanka to Ravana’s brother Vibheeshana, who sided with him in his conflict with Ravana.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200712251540.htm

Bhugol mein Ram (Raja Rama in World geography)

December 25, 2007

Saturday, December 22, 2007


भूगोल में राम

भूगोल में राम

इतिहास में कुछ अत्याचारी शासकों ने स्थानों के नाम जबरदस्ती बदल कर उनमें अपना नाम जोड़ दिया जैसे सिकंदर से सिकन्दरा, औरंगजेब से औरंगाबाद, अहमद से अहमदाबाद । कुछ ने जतिवाचक नाम दे दिए, जैसे पाकिस्तान में हिन्दुबाग से इस्लाम्बाग। परन्तु कुछ ऐसे भी शासक हो गए हैं जिनका नाम लोगों ने स्वेच्छा से अपना लिया और अपने नगर या ग्राम का नाम उस शासक के नाम पर रख दिया. राम ऐसे ही रजा थे जिनकी ख्याति विश्व भर में फैली हुई थी और उनके नाम से कई नगरों और गाओं के नाम सुशोभित किये गए. विश्व भर में फैले इन भौगोलिक नामों का संक्षिप्त विवरण यहाँ देखेंगे.

भारत में तो ४०० से अधिक ऐसे स्थान हैं जिनके नाम के साथ राम का नामजुडा है । अन्य देशों में राम के नाम के साथ बने भौगोलिक नामों का हम अवलोकन करेंगे . कोष्ठक में दिए गए अंक देशांतर (पूर्व) और अक्षांश (उत्तर) के हैं।

१. पाकिस्तान में : पाकिस्तानी सरकारोंने यद्यपि इसलाम के नाम पर कई भौगोलिक नामों को बदल दिया फिर भी राम के नाम से जुडे कई स्थान अज भी मिलते हैं. जैसे, रामदासपुर (७३ , ३०.२५ ), रामगढ़ (७२ , ३०.२५ ), रामचौत्र (७२ , ३०.५ ), रामदिअना (७३ , ३२ ). कोट पैरा राम (७२.५ , ३२.२५ ), राम दिवाली (७३ , ३१.५ ), राम किशन (७२ , ३४ ), रामकली (७१ , ३० ), रामलछ्मन (७३ , ३१ ), रामनिवास (७३ , ३०.५).

२. अफगानिस्तान और इरान : अफगानिस्तान और इरान में भी कई स्थान नाम राम के नाम से संबंधित हैं। जैसे राम देल काले (अफगानिस्तान ६३,३२.५), राम हुर्मोज़ (इरान ५०,३१), राम शहर (इरान ४९,३१), राम सर (इरान, ५१,३७).

३. मध्य पूर्व : राम अन्दन (सीरिया ३७,३७), राम अल अन्ज़ (सीरिया ३७,३४.७५), राम (लेबनान ३६,३४.२५), राम अल्लाह (इस्रायल ३५,३२), राम ओन (इस्रायल ३७,३२.५).

४. सर्बिया : राम (२२,४५).

५. कनाडा : राम नदी (-११०,६२).

६. बंगला देश : राम गोपाल पुर (९१,२४.५), रामकृष्णपुर (९०,२४.५), रामकृष्णपुर (२) (८९,२४), रामचन्द्रनगर (९१,२४.७५), रामनारायाणपुर (९१,२३).

७. म्यांमार (ब्रह्म्देश) : राम देनी (९३,१८), राम देव (९२,१८.२५),

८. मंगोलिया : राम कुरेसुमु (गोबी)

९. पपुआ : राम (१४८, -५)

Murlidhar H. Pahoja

Ramayana era based on planetarium software

December 25, 2007
Ramayana era based on planetarium software
Source: Pushkar Bhatnagar, 2004, Dating the Era of Lord Ram, Delhi, Rupa and Co.
Rama was born on the Navami tithi of Shukla Paksha of Chaitra masa(9th day of the increasing phase of the moon in the lunar month of Chaitra).At that time, the nakshatra was Punarvasu, and Sun, Mars, Saturn, Jupiter and Venus were in Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Cancer and Pisces respectively. Lagna was Cancer and Jupiter & Moon were shining together. — Ramayana 1.18.8,9

clip_image002The conditions can be summarised as follows:
1. Sun in Aries
2. Saturn in Libra
3. Jupiter in Cancer
4. Venus in Pisces
5. Mars in Capricorn
6. Lunar month of Chaitra
7. 9th day after New Moon
     (Navami Tithi, Shukla Paksh)
8. Moon near Punarvasu Nakshatra
      (Pollux star in Gemini constellation)
9. Cancer as Lagna
     (Cancer constellation rising in the east)
10. Jupiter above the horizon
The observations on the left, when entered into Planetarium software gives us the above Sky Chart, which in turns gives forth the below mentioned date.

Sri Rama Navami – 10th January 5114 BCE – Birth Day of Rama
Observation at 12.30 p.m.

Birth of Bharatha
The Sky Chart of Bharatha’s birth is depicted on the right.
This is about 16 hours after birth of Rama.
Birth of Bharatha – 11th January 5114 BCE, 4.30 a.m. clip_image004


Pre coronation eve

King Dashratha to his courtiers – “This month of Chaitra is beautiful and holy. The woods and trees are full of flowers. At this time coronation of Rama is most appropriate.” — Ramayana 2.4.21-22

“Astrologers have told me that my nakshatra has been surrounded by malefic planets like Sun, Mars and Rahu. Under such planetary configurations, the king either dies or falls in some deep conspiracy. Thus, before I face any such problem, you take over the kingship” — – Ramayana 2.4.18
“Today the moon is on Punarvasu nakshatra and tomorrow it will meet the Pushya nakshatra. In that Pushya nakshatra, I am eager to hand over the kingdom to you.” — – Ramayana 2.4.21-22

clip_image006Planets located together in Pisces constellation 4th January 5089 BCE

Khar, Dushan episode

Surpanaka, after her nose-cut encounter with Lakshmana at Panchavati (Nasik), goes straight to her brothers Khar and Dushan, and instigates them to fight against Rama and Lakshmana to avenge her insult. At the behest of Surpanaka, their sister, Khar and Dushan come to engage Rama and Lakshmana in a fight.
The descriptions of Valmiki can be read below.
Valmiki:
“In the middle of his army, Khar, was looking like Mars in the middle of the planets in the sky”.
“When Khar moved with his army towards Rama for the battle, a red coloured evening appeared to be descending all over.“    – Ramayana: 3.23.1
“The sun was covered by a dark coloured disc that had red coloured corners.“    – Ramayana: 3.23.3
“Although it was daytime, it started appearing to be evening.“    – Ramayana: 3.23.9
“The sun was caught by Rahu because of which the sun lost its glow and brightness. Various animals and birds started making noises as if it was dusk.“    – Ramayana: 3.23.12

Khar told Rama – “I want to say many things about my prowess but I would not, because if in the `meanwhile sunset occurs, there would be a break in the battle.“   – Ramayana: 3.29.23

Solar Eclipse description
1. Planets, visible to unaided eyes are
       East to West – Saturn, Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Venus, Jupiter.
2. Mars was in the middle of this chain.
3. Rarely, all the planets are in the day sky.
4. Rarer is Mars in the middle of them.
5. The occurrence of a solar eclipse at that time makes it absolutely unique.
These are some of the rarest of the rare astronomical events, which got recorded because of their uniqueness.

clip_image008 The Solar eclipse on 7th October 5077 BCE reached maxium coverage for Panchwati at 15.10 hours. The Sky Chart on the left shows the configuration at 2.00 p.m. with the Latitude / Longitude for Panchwati

clip_image010Vali Vadham “Hearing the roar of Sugreev, Vali’s face became red like the sun caught by Rahu during the eclipse.”    – Ramayana 4.15.3 “Vali Vadham” occured on 3rd April 5076 BCE during the Solar Eclipse, in the Amavasa Ashada during the morning hours.

Hanuman’s Visit to Lanka

clip_image012

Hanuman’s Visit to Lanka – 12th September 5076 BCE – Lunar Eclipse
The eclipsed moon rose in the eastern sky. It was not a total lunar eclipse. The place of observation is Lanka

Hanuman’s Return from Lanka

clip_image014Hanuman’s Return from Lanka – 14th September 5076 BCE
Observation at 6.30 a.m. The Sun and Moon are shining together. Mars & Jupiter are shining. Also seen Pushya Cancer Swati Virgo Airavat elephant of Indra corresponds to Scorpio.


Army march to Lanka

The Vanara Army march to Lanka – 20th September 5076 BCE
Lakshmana’s observation : “The Venus has gone to the back side, Sapta-rishi (Ursa Major) are visible brightly, Trishanku (Crux) is visible in front. Moola nakshatra, protector of Rakshasa, is inflicted with Dhumra-ketu (node).clip_image016

Notes:

Actual dates of the life

time of Lord Rama

Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:43:18 -0000
   From: “Pushkar” <pushkar39@yahoo.com>
Subject: Actual dates of the life time of Lord Ram

Namaskar

My name is Pushkar Bhatnagar, a resident of New Delhi.

I would like to share a few factual details about the life of Lord Rama through this mail. In case you are interested in knowing about the actual dates of the happening of various events during the life time of Lord Rama – please continue to read. I have found the precise dates of happening of various events during the lifetime of Lord Ram from his birth to the age of 39 years when he returned from 14 year’s exile.

Maharishi Valmiki, who wrote Ramayana, was contemporary of Lord Ram. While narrating the events of lifetime of Lord Ram, Valmiki has incidentally mentioned the position of planets in the sky at different places. For instance, the position of all the planets (visible with unaided eye) has been mentioned for the date of birth of Lord Ram. Later, while mentioning that Lord Ram was sent to exile for 14 years on his 25th birthday, the position of planets in the sky has been mentioned again for that day. Moving forward, it has been stated that on the amavasya (no moon day) of the 10th month of the 13th year of his exile he fought a battle with Khar and Dushan and on that day a solar eclipse was seen from Panchwati. Not only a solar eclipse occurred but the planets were arranged in the sky in a particular manner. Going ahead, he mantions that six months later when Ram killed Bali on the Amavasya of Ashad of the 14th year of exile, another solar eclipse was visible in the morning sky and after five months when Hanuman went to meet Sita at Lanka, a lunar eclipse was witnessed in the evening. Besides these several other planetary positions have also been mentioned at different other places.

It is imporatant to know that planetary positions keep changing every day in the sky and they do not repeat for Lakhs of years!! Moreover, if we know the position of all the planets in the sky, then they refer to one and only one date in history.

The effort to provide dates to the planetary positions mentioned in  Ramayana and other vedic literature began with legendary Bal Gangadhar Tilak in his well known book ‘Orion’. However, the efforts made so far were based on manual computations. Since one revolution of these planets is completed in a highly complex fractional number, it is difficult to arrive at the accurate day and time in history. But in late 90s many software were developed to track the position of planets in the sky and with these software, planets’ position at any given point of time in the sky can be known.

By using a powerful planetarium software, I found that the planetary positions mentioned in Ramayana for the date of birth of Lord Ram had occurred in the sky at around 12.30 p.m. of 10th January 5114 BC. It was the ninth day of the Shukla Paksh of Chaitra month too. Moving forward, after 25 years of the birth of Lord Ram, the position of planets in the sky tallies with their description in Ramayana. Again, on the amavasya of the 10th month of the 13th year of exile the solar eclipse had indeed occurred and the particular arrangement of planets in the sky was visible. ( Date comes to 7th October 5077 BC). Even the occurrence of subsequent two eclipses also tally with the respective description in Valmiki Ramayan. (Date of Hanuman’s meeting Sita at Lanka was 12th September 5076 BC). In this manner the entire sequence of the planetary positions gets verified and all the dates can be precisely determined.

The entire dating has been conducted objectively because the software does not permit any manipulation and the verses of Ramayana are also free of any doubts. Leading scientists and those in this field have appreciated this work. Since the entire sequence tallies, it proves that all the observations in theRamayana were actual recordings and not conjectures.

The indologist suggested that I should have some archaeological evidence in support of these dates because for western historians these dates are too old to be accepted! By god’s grace I came across an interesting  archaeological evidence also and I give it’s details in forthcoming paras.

About a few months back NASA had photographed an ancient bridge like structure between India and Sri Lanka and stated that it appeared to be manmade. Most of our historians and theologists jumped on the story and said it was related to Lord Ram. Later on NASA denied having made any statement as to how the bridge got built etc. The enthusiasm died soon and nothing could be conculded since we were trying to prove that it was built millions of years ago.

Just analyse the situation. Suppose you build your house with stones, which are millions of years old – Does your house also becomes millions of years old?Answer is a clear ‘No’.

This was the mistake we were making while trying to claim the ancient bridge and the antiquity of Lord Ram to millions of years ago. Actually, the remains of the bridge, which Lord Ram had built are still available at a place called ‘ Chedu Karai’ in Tamil Nadu. ‘Chedu’ means ‘Setu’ ( bridge) and ‘Karai’ means ‘corner’. Interestingly, these remains of the bridge are available at the depth of about 10 feet below the water and these are about 1.5  kilometer inside the sea.

We are all aware that the rise of sea level, ever since the end of the last ice age (about 16000 BC), is a continuous phenomenon. There is scientific unanimity today that at the end of the last Ice age (which lasted about 1,20,000 Years) the sea level was about 120 meters below the present level. After that, earth entered the warming phase and Ice started melting. The level of sea started rising. The most interesting thing here is that the depth of sea between India and Sri Lanka is just 6-13 meters. It is not more than 13 meters deep at any place.  Hence, at the end of last Ice age (16000 BC) India and Sri Lanka were connected by land.

The sea level started to rise gradually and again the scientific data suggests that it reached the level of 14 meters as late as 8000 Years ago. This clearly means that what we call as Palk Strait today came into existence only around 6000 BC. Water rose to a level where it was seen above the shallow land between India and Sri Lanka only around 6000 BC. The data is correct to the extent of +/- 1500 years.
It is all available at the website of National Geophysical Data Centre, USA.

Hence, if the narration in Ramayana is to be believed that Rama’s army crossed the sea to reach Lanka, it has to be an event of Post 6000 BC era.

Further, the precise level at which the `remains of the bridge’ built by Lord Rama can be measured and exact date of building the bridge can be ascertained because the rate of rise of sea level is known now very precisely.

All these findings have been published as a book titled “Dating the era of Lord Ram” (By Rupa & Co, Delhi). Hope you would the information interesting. I am sure you would have questions on the subject. I shall be glad to answer the same.

My e mail addresses are
Pushkar39@yahoo.com

Pushkarbhatnagar@hotmail.com

Regards

Pushkar Bhatnagar


Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:01:17 -0000
   From: “shekhar_sinha” <shekhar_sinha@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Actual dates of the life time of Lord RamThe same Ramayan that gives the planetary descriptions (on which the calculation is based on) also tells that Lord Ram came in Treta yug. Matasya purana (47/240,243-246) gives more detail of various decensions and says Bhagwan Ram appeared at the end of 24th treta yug. Currently, 28th Kali yug is in effect according to our scriptures. Various purans give the period of yug cycles also. This gives the period of Lord Ram approx. 18 million years ago.The palentary positions mentioned in Ramayan would also have occured multiple times in history prior to the calculated date…Moreover the date calculated is heavily dependent on interpretation of sanskrit verses and softwares or method of calculation. Thats why every other persons gives his own date with day/month/year and time.

If we have to beleive the historicity of Lord Ram because of Ramayan then we should also beleive that he appeared in treta yug, because the same scripture says so.

http://www.salagram.net/Rama-dates.html

Oct. 12, 2003

A real life hero, not figment of a poet’s imagination
Saroj Bala

THE story of Shri Ram’s life was first narrated by Maharishi Valmiki in The Ramayana, written after he was crowned as the king of Ayodhya. Valmiki was a great astronomer because he made sequential astronomical references on important dates related to the life of Shri Ram indicating the location of planets vis-a-vis zodiac constellations and the other visible stars (nakshatras). A similar position of planets and nakshatras vis-a-vis zodiac constellations has not been repeated in thousands of years. By entering the precise details of the planetary configuration of the important events in the life of Shri Ram, as given in the Valmiki Ramayana, in the software named Planetarium corresponding exact dates of these events according to English calendar can be known.

Pushkar Bhatnagar, of the Indian Revenue Service, had acquired Planetarium from the USA. It is used to predict the solar/lunar eclipses and distance and location of other planets from the earth by the scientists and astronomers. He entered the relevant details about the planetary positions vis-a-vis zodiac constellations narrated by Valmiki and obtained convincing results, thus almost determining the important dates starting from the birth of Shri Ram to the date of his coming back to Ayodhya after 14 years of exile. Valmiki has recorded in Bal Kaand Sarga 19 and shloka 8 and 9 (1/18/8,9) that Shri Ram was born on the ninth tithi of Chaitra month when the position of different planets vis-a-vis zodiac constellations and nakshatras (visible stars) was as under :- 1 Sun in Aries ii) Saturn in Libra iii) Jupiter in Cancer iv) Venus in Pisces v) Mars in Capricorn vi) Lunar month of Chaitra vii) Ninth day after no moon viii) Lagna as Cancer (Cancer was rising in the east) ix) Moon on the Punarvasu (Gemini constellation & Pollux star) x) Day time (around noon)This data was fed into the Planetarium software. The results indicated that this was exactly the location of planets/stars vis-a-vis zodiac constellations on January10, noon time in the year 5114 BC. As per the Indian calendar, it was the ninth day of Shukla Paksha in Chaitra month and the time was around 12 to 1 noontime. This is exactly the time and date when Ram Navmi is celebrated all over India till date.Shri Ram was born in Ayodhya: This fact can be ascertained from several books written by Indian and foreign authors before and after the birth of Christ e.g. Valmiki Ramayana, Tulsi Ramayana, Kalidasa’s Raghuvansam, Bodh and Jain literature etc. These books have narrated in great detail the location, the rich architecture and the beauty of Ayodhya which had many palaces and temples built all over the vast kingdom. Ayodhya was located over the banks of Saryu River with Ganga and Panchal Pradesh on one side and Mithila on the other side. Normally 7,000 years is a very long period during which earthquakes, storms, floods and foreign invasions change the course of rivers, destroy towns and buildings and alter the territories. Therefore, the task of unearthing facts is monumental. The present Ayodhya is shrunken in size and the rivers have changed their course about 40 km north/south.Shri Ram went out of Ayodhya in his childhood (13th year as per Valmiki Ramayana with Rishi Vishwamitra who lived in Tapovan (Sidhhashram) and from there he went to Mithila, the kingdom of King Janaka. Here, he married Sita after breaking the Shiv dhanusha. Researchers have gone along the route adopted by Shri Ram as narrated in Valmiki Ramayana and found 23 places which have memorials existing even as on date to commemorate the events related to his life.These include Shringi Ashram, Ramghat, Tadka Van, Sidhhashram, Gautamashram, Janakpur (now in Nepal) and Sita Kund etc. Memorials are built for great human beings and not for fictitious characters.Date of exile of Shri Ram: In Valmiki Ramayana it is mentioned in Ayodhya Kand (2/4/18) that Dashratha wanted to make Shri Ram the king because Sun, Mars and Rahu had surrounded his nakshatra and normally under such planetary configuration the king dies/or becomes a victim of conspiracies. The zodiac sign of king Dashratha was Pisces and his nakshatra was Rewati. This planetary configuration was prevailing on the January 5, 5089 BC. It was on this day that Shri Ram had to leave Ayodhya for living in the forests for 14 years. He was 25 years old at that time (5114-5089) and there are several shlokas in the Valmiki Ramayana which indicate that Shri Ram was 25 years old when he left Ayodhya for 14 years of exile.Valmiki Ramayana refers to the solar eclipse at the time of war with Khardushan in latter half of 13th year of Shri Ram’s living in forests. Valmiki has also mentioned that it was Amavasya that day and planet Mars was in the middle. When this data was entered, the computer software indicated that there was a solar eclipse on October 7, 5077 BC (Amavasya day) which could be seen from Panchvati. On that date, the planetary configuration was the same as has been described by Valmiki i.e. Mars was in the middle, on one side were Venus and Mercury and on the other side were Sun and Saturn. On the basis of planetary configurations described in various other chapters, the date on which Ravana was killed works out to December 4, 5076 BC. Shri Ram completed 14 years of exile on January 2, 5075 BC. That day was also Navami of Shukla Paksha in Chaitra month. Thus, Shri Ram had come back to Ayodhya when he was 39 years old (5114-5075).Ram Avtar, who had done research on places visited by Shri Ram during 14 years of exile and sequentially moved to the places stated as visited by Shri Ram in the Valmiki Ramayana, started from Ayodhya and went right upto Rameshwaram. He found 195 places which still have the memorials connected to the events narrated in the Ramayana relating to the life of Shri Ram and Sita. These places include: Tamsa Tal (Mandah), Shringverpur (Singraur), Bhardwaj Ashram (situated near Allahabad), Atri Ashram, Markandeya Ashram (Markundi), Chitrakoot, Parnakuti (on banks of Godavari), Panchvati, Sita Sarovar, Ram Kund in Triambakeshwar near Nasik, Shabari Ashram, Kishkindha (village Annagorai), Dhanushkoti and Rameshwar temple.Recently, the Sri Lankan government had expressed a desire to develop Sita Vatika as a tourist spot. Sri Lankans believe that this was Ashok Vatika where Ravana had kept Sita as a prisoner (that was year 5076 BC). An American company engaged in exploring the oceans had put pictures on the Internet of a curved bridge, the ruins of which are lying submerged in Gulf of Mannar between Rameshwaram and Sri Lanka. The age of the stones used has been estimated at 17 million years, though the period of the construction of the bridge has still not been estimated.Indian history has recorded that Shri Ram belonged to the Surya Vansh and was the 64th ruler of this dynasty. The names and other relevant particulars of previous 63 kings are listed on in Ayodhya Ka Itihas written about 80 years back by Rai Bahadur Sita Ram and the ancestors of Shri Ram have been traced out as under: Shri Ram, S/o King Dashratha, S/o King Aja, S/o King Raghu, S/o King Dilip and so on ——-)From Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from Bengal to Gujarat, everywhere people believe in the reality of Shri Ram’s existence, particularly in the tribal areas of Himachal, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and the North-East. Most of the festivals celebrated in these tribal areas revolve around the events in the life of Shri Ram and Shri Krishna.During Ram Rajya, the evils of caste system based on birth were non-existent. Valmiki is stated to be a Shudra. Sita lived with him as his adopted daughter after she was banished from Ayodhya and Shri Ram’s children Luv and Kush grew in his ashram as his disciples. Valmiki was, perhaps, the first great astronomer and that his study of planetary configurations has stood the test of time. Even the latest computer software corroborated his astronomical calculations, proving that he did not commit any error. Shabari is stated to be belonging to Bheel tribe and the army of Shri Ram, which succeeded in defeating Ravana was also formed by various tribals from Central and South India. Facts, events and other relevant details relating to the life of Shri Ram are the common heritage of all the Indians.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20031012/spectrum/main6.htm

Nov. 4, 2007 Interview with Dr. S.R. Rao on Ramayana in archaeology http://tinyurl.com/242e9a

Ramar Paalam/Rama Setu — Evidences

December 22, 2007

Ramar Paalam/ Rama Setu (Rama Dhanushkodi) – Evidences

By Rameshwaram Pakshi Shivam (December 2007) [Translation of attached Tamil booklet]

  1. Foreword
  2. Ramayana epoch – Rama Setu – Evidences
  3. Rama Setu in Tamil literature
    1. Sangam texts
    2. Thevaaram texts
    3. 1300 years of Tamil literature
  4. References to Rama Setu in foreign countries
  5. Historical evidences
    1. Rama Setu as a sacred place
    2. Setu yaatra, copper plate, inscriptional evidences
    3. Rama Setu adored and protected by Setupati Raja’s
    4. Setu yaatra – the route based on historical records
  6. Vaanaram – Human: scientific explanation
    1. Ramapithecus
    2. Archaeological basis
  7. Rameshwaram – geological features and uniqueness
    1. Floating stone
    2. Growing stone
    3. Twisted stone
  8. Soma paanam, suraa paanam – true explanation
  9. Veda expert Agnihotra’s distortion
  10. Conclusion

Acknowledgements:

  1. Tamilnadu Hindu Endowments Department, Rameshwaram temple
  2. Mir publishers, Russia
  3. Prof. S.L. Kamal
  4. Tirunelveli Shaiva Siddhanta Committee
  5. Dinamalar/Dinathanthi/Dinakaran Dailies/Thuglak/Nakkeeran/Junior Vikatan/Reporter magazines
  6. Reviewers, opponents, readers, supporters, printers.

Foreword

History of Tamilnadu is traced back to a period prior to 2nd century BCE, based on direct evidences of records, epigraphs, copper plate inscriptions. It is an unquestionable fact and acknowledged by historians that ancient Sangam age texts like Tolkaappiyam, Akananooru, Puranaanooru, Purappaadal, Paripaalak are written based on the realities of those times.

Historical evidences of over 5000 years – from the days of Tolkaappiyam and in Sangam texts — about lives of people in the Tamil-speaking land from Tirupati to Kanyakumari recount prayers to and belief in Supreme divinity, reference to for example: the Vedas, Yagas, temple worship, divinity (deyvam, kadavul, iraivan), spiritual trances (ayardal-vazhipadudal, veriyaadal), tree worship (kandazhi), shiva (aatiraiyaan, shivaperumaan), Vishnu (maayon, tirumaal). Tolkaapiyam invocatory verse reads:

Prayer should be directed to the divinity who can be attained not only by the devotee but all associated with the devotee.

Tolkaappiyam Meypaattiyal verse reads:

The head of the family explains to the home maker about the divinity and the guru. She is enthralled by the disciplined prayer and introspects, explains the editor of Tolkaappiyam.

Tolkaappiyar who wrote the work (of ancient Tamil grammar) organizes the Tamil people into four groups (varna), based on the presiding divinity for each group:

  1. Maayon into forest world — Vishnu
  2. Ceyon into oceanic world – Murugan
  3. Ventan (Indra) into world of fire – Worship of Indra
  4. Varuna into the earth – Worthip of Varuna

Mullai, Kurinji, Marudam, Neytal are the corresponding earth categories: forest, hill tract, arable land, marine zone.

In Akattinaiyiyal of Paripaadal, there are six devotional verses relating the divine form, the uniqueness of the avataara of the first divinity, Vishnu the all-pervasive.

Text which ante-date Tolkaappiyam are Akattiyam, Iraiyanar Akapporul, Maa Puraanam, Bhutapuraanam, Kalittogai. In all these texts, devotion to the divinity is explicitly documented. Tolkaappiyar in exquisite Tamil, rendering the grammar of the exquisite language explains emphatically to the intellectual community, that the lives of Tamil people were intertwined with devotion to divinity.

A. T. Litman, a Soviet indologist notes: I suspected that independent Russian researchers, and western researchers’ views were only based on religious practices. Because many Indian philosophical and spiritual-cultural traditions were not adequately researched, the neo-historians should be exposed to these traditions.

Russian Professor Nicolai Retih notes that Ramayana presents a unified perspective of Indian thought. The unequalled spiritual strength of Indian people, their devotion to protection of their heritage, find expression in Indian thought formed over millennia, not only through art but also through their lives.

Indo-Soviet cultural relations book notes that Rama, Sita, Lakshmana were adored by Russians as embodiments of humanism.

The winner of India’s Nehru Prize, Ragli Abashitchev says that every Georgian family has a copy of the Georgian translation of Ramayana in their homes. It is disheartening indeed that we Indians do not have even the pride that Russians have in the Ramayana heritage. When this is the truth…

Rationalists counter that Ramayana is a fairy tale, themselves imagining that Sri Rama lived 17 lakh years ago, Sri Rama lived 1,81,44,000 years before present, they dismiss the episodes as myths. Why do these rationalists also aver incoherently and erratically, that Ramayana is only a battle between Dravida and Arya, that Sri Rama is a northern Arya, that Ravana is a Dravida, that Rama drank Soma (and hence a drunkard), that Rama was not born in Bharatam but in Central Asia. This ‘rationalism’ is comparable to scientists’ assertions of yester years that Pluto was a planet of the Sun family and who now assert that Pluto is not a planet but only a star.

Why haven’t those who consider themselves ‘rationalists’ and who ridicule that Ramayana, Sri Rama, Rama Setu are falsehoods, opposed the beliefs in other religions which are not ‘rational’? This is for them to introspect. Taking the help of Jesuit scientists, they try to justify their imaginary notions. For the devotees, there are many texts which contain references to Setu: 1. Rigveda, 2. Krishna Yajurveda, 3. Dhanu Smruti, 4. Galavasmruti, 5. Gautama smruti, 6. Marichi Smruti, 7. Devala Smruti, 8. Parasara Smruti, 9. Valmiki Ramayanajm, 10. Adhyatma Ramayanam, 11. Ananda ramayanam, 12. Tulsidas Ramayanm, 13. Agneya Puranam, 14. Bhagavata Puranam, 15. Padma Puranam, 16. Shiva Puranam, 17. Karma Puranam, 18. Skanda Puranam, 19. Markandeya Puranam, 20. Brahmanda Puranam, 21. Matsya Puranam, 23. Deyva Ganapati, 24. Periya Puranam, 25. Tiruppugazh, 26. Thaayumaanavar songs, 28. Dayaasatakam, 29. Venkatadri Vishvaguna Darsam, 30. Tiruvilaiyadam Puranam, 31. Devaiyulaa, 32. Setu Puranam. Apart from there, it is rare to find any Baratilla language ancient literature without reference to Setu. (Acknowledgement: Hindu Endowment Department officer, Shri K. Sundaramurthy, IAS, Chennai, 1980).

If all these are excerpted and published, over 1000 pages will be filled. This monograph is intended to present only evidences to inform believers of Hindu traditions and heritage based on Tamil literature, Tamil historical documents, researches of Anthropologists, to prove the reality of Rama (Dhanushkodi) Setu only near Rmeshwar and is a place considered sacred by Hindu devotees.

Ramayana epoch – Rama Setu Evidences

Hindus believe that Ramayana epoch relates to Treta yuga and that the events of Ramayana occurred in the latter part of this yuga.

The manvantara system of time-reckoning of Bharata nation:

12 Suryamaana months = 1 Deva day

360 Deva days = 1 Deva year

1200 Deva years = 1 Catur Yuga

71 Catur Yuga = 1 Manvantara

14 Manvantara = 1 Kalpa

This is the basis of reckoning Yuga periods (and it will be erroneous to reckon based on current practices).

The periods elapsed in Yugas in the Hindu tradition:

Kretayuga period 17,28,000

Tretayuga period 12,96,000

Dwaraparayuga period 8,64,000

Kaliyuga period 4,32,000

When the Caturyuga according to Hindu reckoning is only 27,64,800 years, without reading carefully the Hindu astronomical traditions, it is not an exaggeration to state that, based on western Jesuit doubts, people argue that it is impossible to accept that Sri Rama lived 17 lakh years before present – 1,81,44,000 years before present.

The reckoning of total time is NOT based on human life-years, but on earth-time.

For earth-time, 60 naalika = 1 shvaasa, 21,600 shvaasa = 1 day.

21,600 X 80 = 17,28,000 years

21,600 X 60 = 12,96,000 years

21,600 X 40 = 8,64,000 years

21,600 X 20 = 4,32,000 years

Thus, yuga periods are reckoned based on earth-years, and NOT based on human life-years.

Russian and American space research organizations have confirmed that this reckoning is scientific: if man were to live outside of the earth’s rotational path, his life-span will be higher than the life-span on earth. When this is the explanation, how is it fair to talk without researching the facts?

Rama Setu structure

As mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana, the evidences for its location in Rameshwaram-Dhanushkodi are provided : atra purvam mahadevah prasaam asoorot prabhu.

While returning to Ayodhya, together with Sita Devi, after killing Ravana, there are episodes related from Pushpaka Vimaana. Sri Rama notes, pointing to the starting point of Setu (Dhanushkodi), that Sri Mahadeva granted anugraha to Sri Rama at this place.

Rama Setu is 100 yojanas long, 10 yojanas wide, according to Valmiki Ramayana. This ratio of 10:1 is evidenced by the dimensions of Rama Setu at Rameshwaram-Dhanushkodi.

The pre-colonial Indian linear measure reckoning table was as follows:

24 angula = 1 muzham

4 muzham = 1 dhanu

2 dhanu = 1 danda

50 danda = 1 kooppidu

4 kooppidu = 1 yojana

This is the basis for determining the 100 yojana length. Any other way of linear measurement will be like the blind figuring out an elephant.

One yojana is the longest distance traveled by sound – of a call from a tall place; the sound distance (300 metres or 1050 feet).

10 yojanas wide = 300 m X 10 = 3000 metres = 10,500 ft.

100 yojanas long = 300 m X 100 = 3,00,000 metres = 10,50,000 ft.

Thes actual dimensions of Rama Setu can be seen by everyone.

Even if we follow the argument of Jesuit scientists that it is only 10,00,000 years since human beings evolved, Hindu people believe that Ramayana events occurred in the latter part of Treta yuga and hence, assuming that Ramayana occurred in the 1,00,000th year of Treta yuga + Dwapara yuga 8,32,000 years, uptodate Kali 5107 total 9,37,107 years. We can explain that Ramayana occurred 62,893 years after the evolution of modern man. Thus, instead of researching objectively, if the objective is just to ridicule Hindu belief systems, any efforts to argue ‘scientifically’ will not be effective.

Rama Setu in Sangam literature, evidence from 2300 years before present

If we accept as factual evidence the kings, events mentioned in Sangam literature, 2300 years before present evidences for Rama Setu, Purattirattil Ramayana, Sri Rama, Vaanara species are provided in: Akanaanooru, Puranaanooru, Kalittogai, Paripaadal.

Puranaanooru 378

Akanaanooru 70:13.17 (which refers to tolmudu kodi = very old Dhanushkodi).

Tolkaappiyam Purattinaiyiyal. Scholiast Naccinaarkkiniyar provides the example from Purattirattu which praises Sri Rama to explain a Tolkaappiyan reference to a person who ignores those who ridicule and those were ridiculed.

In the explanatory work of Professor Marapiyal, vaanara are referred to as species with five senses. There also references to Vaanara in Tolkaapiyam Porul adhikaaram.

Manimekalai refers to the exploits of Vaanara.

When the Sangam texts undoubtedly refer to Ramayana, what to say of those who claim that there is no refernce to Rama in Sangam literature?

Devaaram texts – evidences for Rama Setu, 1400 years before present

Appar 2834 says: mountains amidst the ocean…the temple of Rameswaram given by Mahadeva.

Tirujnana Sambandar Devaaram: He who made the bridge to cross the ocean…from Rameshwaram…

For over 1400 years, Rameshwaram Ramanatha Swamy temple is said to be close to the Rama Setu (Tiruvanaikkarai, Ramar Paalam). What more emphatic evidence is needed than this text from Devaaram?

In the dictionary made by Tamil genius Veeramaa Munivar in 1928, some terms are explained:

Tidal = tittai, medu

Tittai = tidar padukkai

According to this, tidal means a place made of stones, sand and water. Appar refers to Rama Setu as Tidal.

Rama Setu-Rameshwaram is a sacred tirtham in the ocean. The term, Setu, is explained in Tamil Dictionary 1928 NV Press, Choolai, Madras as: red artificial bund; this is in the ocean close to Rameshwaram near Setubandhanam.

In the Comparative Grammar of Dravidian languages of Coldwell (1875), Koti – Koru is explained as a Tamil word also called Dhanushkodi in Tamil. Rama’s bow is Dhanu. What is mentioned here is Rameshwaram.

Historical personalities, the Adiyaar who spread the shaiva siddhanta have clearly stated that Rama Setu is near Rameshwaram, Ramanatha Swamy temple, that Rama Setu is in Dhanushkodi.

Rama Setu – 7th century and later periodliterary evidences

Kalingattu Parani: refers to Vaanara reaching beyond the ocean across a bund.

Kamba ramayanam: refers to Rama Setu near Rameshwaram across the ocean; also notes that the Gandhamaadana mountain is near Rama Setu (Kamba. Meetcip. 21-22).

Rama Setu in Periyaazhvar Paasuram: vaanara…building bridge… to Srilanka…carrying stones and wood to make the bridge to cross the ocean…

Rama Setu in Kodai Naacciyaar Paasuram: Setubandham…

Rama Setu in Villipputtur Mahabharatam: Arjuna visits sacred Setu…

15th century work Setu Puranam clearly states that Setu is near Rameshwaram.

This is an unshakeable belief of Hindus, unassailable historical truth that for over 2300 years from the days of Sangam literature Sri Rama build the Setu by bunding the ocean with the help of vaanara and this is what makes it sacred Setu Dhanushkodi punya kshetram.

Rama Setu in foreigners’ accounts — evidences from 1000 years before present

Al Biruni (1030 Common Era) is a Persian traveler who has left historical accounts. In these accounts, Ummal Naaraa or Rameshwar is a place on the opposite shore of Srilanka. The ocean in-between is 12 farsang. From Panchayavaar, Rameshwaram is at a distance of 40 farsang. From Rameshwaram, Setu Bandar is at a distance of 2 farsang. Setu bandha means a bund formed in the ocean. Dasaratha Chakravarti’s son Rama constructed this bridge. This bridge was to link the land to Srilanka fort. This looks like different islands today. Betwixt these islands are ocean waves. (Sachau, Alberuni’s India, Vol. I, pp. 208-10 quoted by KA Neelakanta Shastri in his foreign notices of South India (1972), pp. 131-132.

Historical evidences

For over 1000 years, Rama Dhanushkodi Rama Setu is a sacred tirthasthaana for Hindus. There is historical evidence for this. That this is a sacred heritage is continuously accepted by kings and by people who have been engaged in Setu yatra and in making offerings at Dhanushkodi (Rama Setu). There is continous evidence for these facts, according to researcher S.L. Kamal.

Rashtrakuta king, Krishna III in 901 Common Era, Chola kings set up a victory tower in Setu end (Rameshwaram) after winning over Srilanka king. (Kolhapur Copper plate).

In 10th century, 932 CE, Parantaka Chola performed Tulaabhaara in Rameshwaram and donated gold to the temple, brahmanas. (Velanjeri Copper plate).

1187 CE Nissanga Malla stayed in Rameshwaram and built a temple for Nissangeshwara (Stone inscription in Pali language).

1377-1404 CE Harihara kings Virupaksha and Goppadippa came to Rameshwaram.

1408 CE Vijayanagara emperor Narasimha came on Rameshwaram Yatra and performed 18 daanas.

1617 CE Vijayanagara emperor Krishnadeva Raya performed Rameshwaram sthala yatra, stayed in Rameshwaram for 3 days and performed 32 daanas.

Dhanushkodi (Rama Setu) held sacred and protected by Ramanathapuram, Setupati Rajas

From 1606 CE, many copper plate inscriptions of Setupati Rajas confirm that Dhanushkodi is Rama Setu.

The copper place inscriptions and epigraphs of Setupati Rajas establish that this is the sacred Rama Setu adored by Hindus.

Rajas who protected Setupati call themselves proudly – protectors of Setu, setukkaavalar – Rama Dhanushkodi kaavalar (protectors). They made their donations at Setu Rama Dhanushkodi. In all copper plate inscriptions, the beneficial effect is mentioned as equivalent to the pratishthaana of one crore shivalingas. This is an undeniable, transparent historical evidence.

“Glorious Sri Rama, Dhanushkodi protector, starting from Setu.”

“Protecting Setu, protecting Madurai, protector of divine, sacred Dhanushkodi.”

Such statements show that the protection of Rama Setu was more important than their lives and that they discharged this divine responsibility with great fervour.

1606 CE From the rulership of Setupati janapada, First Setumoola Raksha Durandan, Setumoola Durattaan, Setupati Kaatta Devar, Duraikkaavalan, Setukaavalan, Ramadhanushkodi, Kodi Dhanushkodi Teerhamaadiya Sugandham.

1414 CE When the predecessors of Setupati were the first kings, on the road through Ramanadu, Madurai, Thanjavur, Pudukkottai, for Setu yatra, many free anna chatrams, water fountains, shelters were provided and ensure the safe yaatra for the people. These are historical truths.

Setu yatra, Rama Setu (Dhanushkodi point) worship, Ashadha amavasya, Tai amavasya, Ardhodaya, Mahodaya, Purattaasi Amavasya, days of Grahanas, Mahaamagam, Dakshinaayana, Uttaraayana punyakaala are special sacred days on which thousands of people have visited the sacred place for several hundreds years before present.

Setupati Rajas’ copper plate inscriptions report that Rama Dhanushkodi is a worshipful place for gaining punyam. Even today, the worship continues.

16th century literary works extol the sacred Rama Setu as: ardhodayam, mahodayam, even thinking of Dhanushkodi or praising Dhanushkodi or visiting Dhanushkodi are sacred virtues.

Because Setu kings offered Hiranyagarbha daanam at Setu Rama Dhanushkodi, the kings added an additional attribute to their title: Hiranya Garbhayaaji.

Setu yatra pilgrimage route – 41 grama daanas offered by Setupati Kings

The Chola nadu, Pandiya nadu, Cera nadu remind us of the Setu yatra pilgrimage routes join at Rameshwaram Rama Setu Dhanushkodi.

First route: From Chola des’am moving south, along the eastern coastline, Kottaipattinam, Chandrapandiya pattinam, Tondi, Tiruppalaikkudi, Aatraangarai, Mandapam reaching Dhanushkodi.

Second route: From Pandiya Nadu from Madurai moving east southern bank of Vaigai river Maanamadurai, Paramakkudi, Ramanathapuram, Naagaacci Mandapam reaching Dhanushkodi.

Third route: From Cera nadu from Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli region coastline, northern bank of Vempaar, Saayalkudi, Kadukuccandai, Sikkal, Uttirakosa Mangai ekkakudi, Tiruppullaani, Veedaalai reaching Dhanushkodi.

These three routes link with Rama Setu through Pamban Kundukaal Tangaccimadam, Akkaalmadam, Nambukovil. Even today, these three routes are used for transport systems, a historical fact.

There are historical evidences along these chains of routes. Recently government departments destroyed stone buildings which are of historical buildings on this routes. It is a matter for regret that Tamilnadu Archaeological Department did not make any efforts to save these monuments.

On these Setu routes are: anna chatram, water fountains, shelters built by Setu Rajas, 41 gramas donated by Setu kings. Some people of Ramanathapuram call these Danukkodi. Without conducting any archaeological investigations and researches, hurting the sentiments of over 70 crore Hindus, what use is the so-called religious freedom afforded by the Constitution?

Historical personalities who visited Rama Dhanushkodi:

1659 Thanjavur king Vijayaraghunatha Naicker

1677 Chatrapati Shivaji

1792 Travancore Raja

1795 Kattabomma Naicker

1795 Sarafoji Raja

1795 Chennai Governor Hobert

1804 Valentine Prabhu

1808 Mysore Diwan Purnaiah

1894 Thar Samsthaan Rani

1893 Swami Vivekananda

1896 Mysore Raja

1911 Ramakrishna Paramahamsa’s wife Sharada Devi

Nepal princes’ principal responsibility is to visit Rameshwaram Rama Dhanushkodi immediately after ascending the throne.

1964 Even after Dhanushkodi was submerged during the cyclone, many citizens, bhaktas, officials, taking sankalpa that this is a bridge to pass the ocean of birth cycles, visit on four-wheeled vehicles visit the spot where the sacred Rama Setu begins at Dhanushkodi.

In 17th century the name of Adam’s Bridge was given by James Rennel not on the basis of any faith. Thousands of years before the British regime began, Dhanushkodi has been worshipped as a sacred place, this is historical, this is tradition.

Geology, anthropology – scientific expanations

Vaanaram – evidence for monkey species. First man neanderthal’s predecessors

In 1981 Soviet scientist Dr. Mihail Nestoorh wrote about human species and provided evidence of monkey species existence. North of Delhi in Shivalik mountain ranges, bone fragments, teeth, jaws of monkeys, predecessors of humans. Many crore years ago, in Myocene times, these are referred to as tripothecus, ramapithecus bone fragments.

Further, in South East Ais were found fossils of jaigatopithecus, meganthiroppus human antecents.

Dividing earth-time into four parts, over 1.02 crore years ago, monkey as human predecessor had appeared. In the fourth earth-time era, about 10 lakh years before present, the modern human appeared. In the third earth-time era stage itself, homo erectus had appeared eating roots and pulses using stones and sticks, in the land regions of south asia, in indo-malay region.

Nehru who supports the theory of Ramayana war as Dravida-Arya war and opposes the linguistically based division of people by Thos, Allen Dubois, Max Mueller, Caldwell. But on the first page of his book, he claims that all people of Bharatam are of multiple races and that colour of the skin is due only to the blowing winds and solar rays. He also clearly notes that to impose their supremacy by a divide-and-rule policy, the western European nations created the divisions among Aryans and Dravidians.

This Socialist Russia’s book by M. Nestoorh explains that Aryan-dravidian conflict is an imperialist conspiracy. This book on Human Races clearly establishes that Vaanara are the ancestors of the human race.

Vaanara (monkey human)—arcaheological evidence

In Ethiopia skeleton parts of a monkey-human of over 30 lakh years ago (based on Carbon dating) have been found. Recently, in the desert close to Egypt, a fossil human footprint has been discovered, stated to be before 30 lakh years.

Printed on clay, as the clay became stone, the footprint is intact. Archaeological research is ongoing. Researches have also found that monkeys and their offsprings conversed using sign language and that they performed human-like activities. Just as Europeans occupied America and destroyed the Amerindians, it will be no exaggeration to say that modern human destroyed the Vaanara race.

Rameshwaram – Geological feature, uniqueness

A lady scholar of Sangam age, Cirukaakkaipaatiniyaar in her poem notes that the border of Tamilnadu is Ten Kumari. In this southern region, Pahruli river, Panainadu, Kapaatapuram, Ten Madurai flourished and because of geological changes, sea incursions occurred. This sea incursion has been established by many scientific researches. This also shows that before Kanyakumari was formed as the end-point, Rameshwara Dhanushkodi region of southeast Tamilnadu was the end-point. This is confirmed by Caldwell.

Upto 1480 Rameshwaram was only an island as shown in Ramanathapuram Manual and South Indian epigraphs.

Rameshwaram is referred to as Tenmudukoti in Sangam texts. This dweepam was truncated during the cyclone of 1480. On this island are found limestone (called nay muruku kal), growing stones (called Mundukkal).

Using these stones were constructed, in 1508, Rameshwaram Ramanathaswamy Temple first praakaaram, second praakaaram, departure mandapam, praakaara circular wall. In ancient times, houses, palaces, inns were built using these stones.

These limestone rocks are found in Callimalai, vadakaadu, erakaadu, olaikkudaa regions. Even today, mundukkal (valarpaarai) is used for foundations. The uniqueness of this stone is that it is composed of clay and limestone and adheres effectively. Only the stone found along the ocean coast even when heavy has the characteristic of a floating stone which floats in water.

The stone is porous and allows for flow of air. Many layers of the eastern gopuram are built using this stone. Even today, fragments are being discovered.

Soma paanam – suraa paanam Soutrapuraanam – evidence

Soma paanam is made of wood pith and juice of leaves (comparable to the tea, cane juice, fruit juices that we imbibe today).

Suraapaanam is saaraayam, kallu, paangu, intoxicating drinks. To say that he drank Soma and hence is a drunkard is not to realize the basic difference between Soma paanam and Suraa paanam. This is like saying that my mortal eye cannot see Budha and hence Budha planet does not exist.

Veda texts explain the process of preparing Soma in many instances. Without researching how Soma paanam is prepared, what are its ingredients and what is the difference between Soma paanam and Suraa paanam, it is amazing that comments are being made.

Veda pundit’s bizarre, contradictory opinions

In 1976, in Ramanathaswamy Kumbabhisheka Souvenir, Venerable Sri Agnihotram Ramanuja Thathachariar wrote an article titled, Vaishnavam and Rameshwara Kshetram.

Atra purvam mahadevah prasaam asoorot prabhuh This is the basis for the Rameshwara kshetram. Thathachariar refers to the event when Sri Rama shows the Setu from Pushpaka Vimaana to Sita Devi and records Dhanushkodi (Rameshwaram) as the place where Mahadeva blessed Sri Rama.

In 2007, to say that there is no prastaapam (uniqueness) about Rama Setu, that we should not destroy our economic development based on futile belief is surprising. What to take as the truth? Let bhaktas decide.

Conclusion

Discovery of copper age Dwaraka, discovery of proof for the existence of River Sarasvati, for the events of Mahabharata are remarkable archaeological achievements. In independent Bharatam after 50 years of independence, it is a matter of regret that we have not established effective research projects related to Ramayana, the place names linked with Ramayana in the Deccan plateau, but are following the opinions of western indologists.

No attempts have been to preserve and protect the over 600 years old monuments along the Rama Setu yatra routes. Callimalai, Gandhamaadaparvatam, Sundara mudaiyaan, Railway station, Dakshina murti, buddha pratimaa found in Aariyar kunru, many palaces, inns are not being protected and no research projects are in place. The Buddha statue lies unattended in Ramanathapuram Ramalinga Vilas Palace. In archaeological parlance, these are time mirrors of truth.

In Rameshwaram region, Pallavar, Pandiyar, Chola, Chalukya, Srilanka Parakrama Bahu, Bauddha, Samana, prehistoric evidences exist to conduct such researches. Without undertaking such researches, to say that Rama Setu does not exist is to hurt the sentiments of over 70 crore Hindus. Indian Constitution guarantees religious freedom, right to sacred pilgrimage places, right to faith. These have to be protected by any project.

Tiruvalluvar said: Meyporul kaanpadarivu. On this basis, scientific investigations have to be carried out and results of researches made known to people of India. This is the responsibility of the state and of the Archaeological Survey of India.

Tamil literary, Tamil historical tradition and evidences together with scientists’ findings clearly establish the truth that Rama Setu is near Rameshwaram.

What the late PM Lal Bahadur Shastri said about Rama Setu: I am very happy to visit this yatra sthalam linked with unforgettable historical events of Bharata des’am. This big yatra reminds us of Sri Rama. Many hundreds and thousands of people have come here to get inspired and spiritually uplifted. Still they are coming. This is the truth.

clip_image002

clip_image004

clip_image006

clip_image008

clip_image010

clip_image012

clip_image014

clip_image016

clip_image018

clip_image020

clip_image022

clip_image024

The truth about Setu Samudram — MV Kamath

December 20, 2007

The truth about Sethu Samudram

M V Kamath | Wed, 19 Dec, 2007 , 03:12 PM (Newstoday)

.

The truth about Sethu Samudram Writing in Frontline (15 October), one Mr D Ramachandran reveals some extremely important facts that merit attention. In the first place, he states that the Ram Sethu ‘is a discontinuous chain of sandbars dotting a 30 km stretch in the East-West direction between the Palk Day and the Gulf of Mannar’.

Then he makes the point that palcogegraphic studies suggest that the sea level in the region has oscillated significantly over historical times, exposing the seabed between India and Sri Lanka periodically.

According to him ‘around 6,000 to 7,000 years ago, the sea level was just 17 meters below the present level, resulting in partial exposure of the seabed. The Marino and Water Resources Group of SAC/ISRO concluded after space-based investigations that the so-called Adam’s Bridge – or Ram Sethu – is not man-made but comprises 103 small patch reefs lying in a linear pattern with roof crest (flattened, emergent, especially during low tides) and intermittent deep channels.

The MWRG interpreted the linearity of the Sethu to be due to the old share line – implying that the two land masses of India and Sri Lanka were once connected.

What can we deduce from these admissions? One, that a long time ago, India and Sri Lanka were indeed linked by a wall of coral in one continual stretch. Two, there were times when that wall was broken at intervals by violent seawaves, but not to the extent of making repairs difficult.

From this we can deduce that if someone were to fill these intermittent minor channels with sand and stones, it would still be possible to acquire a continuous link between India and Sri Lanka, practically a roadway – call it a ‘bridge’ for all one cares – that would enable a vanar sena to cross over from India to Sri Lanka effortlessly, even in single file Ergo, what a Vanar Sena merely had to do was to fill in the intermittent sea channels with stones to make a transportable way from the Indian sub-continent to the Sri Lanka island, requiring no major feat.

That would mean that some Vanar Sena did build a ‘bridge’, using Nature as a base. If we admit to this rational explanation, one can accept both propositions.

One, that a link of sorts was already in existence when the Vanar Sena came to think of it and two, that the Sena did indeed help build a bridge, by filling in broken gaps in the carol roof with capacious stones and sand.

Granting that the entire connection was not man-made and that a discontinuing physical link was already in existence, what the Vanars did apparently was to fill in the intermittent breaks within the continuous coral wall to build a smooth highway for free movement. If this is understood, discussion then ceases.

One can believe that the Vanars did indeed build a ‘bridge’ – though not in the usual meaning of the term. If this line of thinking is accepted – and why shouldn’t it not? – then everything falls in it place. One can accept both the scientific findings as well as the so-called mythology surrounding the Ram Sethu.

In regard to the latter, all that one had to do was for the Vanars to carry stones to help fill in the gaps in the broken coral reef wall and thereby complete the passageway from India to Sri Lanka for the smooth transport of men and material. Let us now take an expert’s views on the usefulness and relevance of the proposed Sethu Samudram project.

In an interview to Rediff, Captain H Balakrishnan, who has been associated with the Navy for 32 years and is knowledgeable about the pluses and minuses of the Project, has made some relevant observations. According to him, from a mariner’s standpoint, the Sethu Samudram project ‘does not make any nautical sense’.

In the first place, the Indian Meteorological Department has assigned the coast between Rameshwaram and Cuddalore as ‘a high risk probability”. Thus, in 1964 the Pamban Bridge was washed away by a severe cyclonic storm. In the second place, maintaining a depth of 12 metres for ships to pass will entail round-the-year dredging.

Once the Channel is set up it will have to be continuously dredged and that adds to the maintenance expenditure. This is a hidden cost. Then again, by the very nature of the project, a 60,000 / deadweight tonne carrier will need anything in excess of a 12 metre draft.

But 60,000 tone carriers are a thing of the past. Today we have very large carriers of the type of 150,000 and 185,000 tones none of which will ever be able to use the Sethu Samudram. Even more relevantly, for a ship to pass through the Sethu Samudram waters, it has to drastically cut down on its speed because the water is shallow and a moving ship will create what it known as the ‘Squat Effect’.

According to Capt Balakrishnan, a large ship has to cut down its speed from around 12 and 13 knots per hour to about 6 knots, especially if it is a bulk carrier. Then again, the Sethu Samudram is not an open seaway. It is like entering into a port.

A pilot has to board a ship which ordinarily means that for letting a pilot aboard, an hour has to be wasted and similarly another hour has to be wasted to let him down.

Asks Capt Balakrishnan: ‘With this 6 knot speed and two hours pilotage delay, the time of Tuticorin via Sethu Samudram works out to 100 hours 30 minutes. If one went round Sri Lanka, the time taken would be 102 hours 15 minutes. So the net savings in time by going through Sethu Samudram is 1 hour 45 minutes. Would it be worth spending Rs. 2,400 crores – the amount sanctioned for the entire Project – just to save 105 minutes of sailing? Whatever the authorities under political pressure might exaggerate, Mr Balakrishnan doesn’t expect more than 1,000 ships using the Sethu Samudram canal.

Taking into account cost incurred per ship, using the Sethu Samudram route would entail shipping companies lose Rs. 19 lakhs per voyage. According to Capt Balakrishnan, what is being planned ‘is a white elephant in the making’. He doesn’t say it, but everyone knows that the government is willing to spend over Rs. 2,400 crores to satisfy the whims of a coalition partner, the DMK.

This is atrocious and should be strongly resisted, especially also considering the damage the Sethu would do for the livelihood of thousands of fishermen and their families, who will be forced to look for alternate ways of making their meagre fortunes.

http://www.newstodaynet.com/printer.php?id=3264

Rama Setu: BJP to counter DMK’s campaign

December 19, 2007

DMK and BJP ready for Sethu battle
 
Chennai, Dec. 18: The Ram Sethu controversy, that seemed to have died down, has reared its head again in the state, thanks to the DMK which has resolved to launch an intense campaign in support of the project. With DMK president and chief minister M.Karunanidhi having called for his youth cadres to go “village-after-village” to propagate the benefits of the project for the state and the nation, the state unit of Bharathiya Janata Party (BJP) is also ready to counter the ruling party’s decision with its own campaign machinery.

“We will respond to DMK’s challenge in the same manner. When they (the DMK) say they are ready to make sacrifices, we too are ready to make sacrifices to protect Ram Sethu. Our contention is that Ram Sethu should not be demolished but the Sethu Samudram project should be implemented. The BJP will campaign on the scientific advantages of Ram Sethu and to what extent it serves as a protection for the people living in the coastal areas,” state BJP president L.Ganesan told reporters on Tuesday.

On Sunday, Mr.Karunanidhi told the mega youth conference that the issue had been blown out of proportion and cases had been filed against him in the north and the south and hoped that the court would deliver a verdict in favour of the project. He charged that the BJP which had sanctioned the Sethu project during its rule at the Centre was trying to scuttle it after 75 per cent of the work had been completed.

The DMK conference adopted a resolution condemning BJP, Hindu Munnani, AIADMK supremo Jayalalithaa, Janata Party president Subramamian Swamy and the other “anti-Tamil and religious forces for obstructing the implementation of the Sethu project that would help step up the nation’s security, bolster economic development in Tamil Nadu and provide employment opportunities for thousands of youth.”

“Some religious forces are seriously trying to block the project with a political motive by citing imaginary reasons that are contrary to science and unrelated to history,” the resolution said.
Going by Mr.Karunanidhi’s diktat that his party youth counter the propaganda with scientific facts immediately, Mr.Stalin, holding charge of youth wing, had said that the misinformation campaign in the name of Lord Ram would be defeated and the party would chalk out a plan of action, and train volunteers to speak on the issue in all the panchayats across the state.

In response the BJP leader said, “Our campaign to protect Ram Sethu has assumed so much significance that the DMK has passed a resolution against it.” The BJP had at its state central committee decided to conduct a `village-to-village’ campaign on the history of Lord Ram and the Rama Sethu. Meanwhile, the Ramar Sethu Protection Movement will hold a “Save Ram Sethu” rally in New Delhi on December 30.

ttp://www.deccan.com/chennaichronicle/home/homedetails.asp#DMK%20and%20BJP%20ready%20for%20Sethu%20battle

Sethu project: TN BJP to launch counter campaign
18 Dec 2007, 2245 hrs ISTclip_image001,clip_image002PTI

CHENNAI: Countering the DMK’s decision to mobilise the youth for campaigning for the implementation of the Sethusamudram project, the BJP’s Tamil Nadu unit on Tuesday said it would launch a village-level campaign to refute the ruling party’s claims.

Rejecting the DMK’s contention that the opposition to the project was unscientific,BJP state unit president L Ganesan told reporters here that his party would counter it by explaining that 31 per cent of the world’s thorium reserves were located around Ram Setu.
“What will happen to the rich deposits of thorium, if ‘Ram Sethu’ is destroyed,” he asked.

Te DMK, at its recently-concluded youth wing conference in Tirunelveli, adopted a resolution, urging the Centre to hasten the completion of the project and asked its cadre to conduct a village-level campaign to build public opinion in favour of the project aimed at deepening the sea around the Palk Straits.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Sethu_project_TN_BJP_to_launch_counter_campaign/articleshow/2632311.cms

Rama Setu: BJP to counter DMK’s campaign

Special Correspondent

CHENNAI, Dec. 18, 2007: The Bharatiya Janata Party will counter the proposed campaign of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam on the Sethusamudram project, L. Ganesan, president of the State unit, said here on Tuesday.

Reacting to Local Administration Minister M.K. Stalin’s announcement on the propaganda strategy for mobilising public opinion in support of the project, Mr. Ganesan told reporters at the party headquarters that the BJP would accept the challenge by launching village-wise campaigns. Expressing the hope that the DMK’s campaign would be conducted in a democratic way, Mr. Ganesan said the BJP would highlight the adverse consequences of demolition of Ramar Sethu and how the project could be implemented without disturbing the Sethu.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/12/19/stories/2007121961540800.htm

Rama Setu by the National Poet Sri Maithili Sharan Gupt

December 19, 2007

Another National Poet, Subrahmanya Bharati was also inspired by Rama Setu; he sang:

singala teevinukkor paalam amaippom

setu vai medurutti veedi samaippom

(Let us build a bridge to Simhala, Let us elevate Setu and create a highway).

kalyan

 

Rama Setu by the National Poet Sri Maithili Sharan Gupt

By Sarvesh Tiwari

Mahakavi Sri Maithili Sharan Gupt is rightly known as the Rashtra Kavi (national poet). His remarkable poetry reflects the deepest national ethos of Bharat and his simple yet impactful words never fail to awaken the patriotic energy of its readers.

‘Bharat-Bharati’ is one of his most towering marvels, which always inspired the freedom fighters and nationalists. It contains the poet’s reflections on the past and the future of Bharat and Bharati – India and Indic.

In this large volume, at one place, he says:

भूगर्भ से जब तब निकलती वस्तुयें ऐसी यहाँ -

जो पूछ उठती हैं कि ऐसी थी हुई उन्नति कहाँ?

वह सिन्धु सेतु बचा अभी तक, दक्षिणी मन्दिर बचे,

कब और किसने, विश्व मे, यों शिल्प-चित्र कहाँ रचे?

{Every now and then such objects keep being unearthed by excavations,

which provoke us and ask, ‘where else was such evolution achieved do you know?’

That Sindhu Setu is still intact so far, and so are our wondrous temples in the South

Where else have such architectural marvels been created, by whom and when, they cry!}

Sri Maithili Sharan Gupt also wrote ‘Saket’. It is a unique narrative of Ramayana by Urmila, Lakshmana’s wife who stayed back in Ayodhya, separated from her husband during his forteen-years exile with Rama. In Saket, Urmila is made to describe the turn of events during those years with focus on happenings in Ayodhya. Saket is still considered a classic today.

In Saket, Sri Gupt has described Setu Bandhan as follows:

तब लंका पर हुई चढाई, सजी रिक्ष-वानर सेना,

मिल मानो दो सलिल-राशियाँ उमडी फैलाकर फेना!!

भंगभित्तियाँ उठा उठा कर सिन्धु रोकने चला प्रवाह

बान्धा गया किंतु उलटा वह, सेतु रूप ही है उत्साह!!

नीलनभोमण्डल-सा जलनिधि, पुल था छायापथ-सा ठीक,

खींच दी गई एक अमिट-सी, पानी पर भी प्रभु की लीक!!

{Then began marching to Lanka the decorated armies of riksha-s and vaanara-s,

Together, both appeared as if two separate seas simultaneously on tide!

Ocean came forward to halt them by raising huge wall-like waves,

However, ocean was itself bound. Setu – but an icon of courage!

Setu – shining just like a starry-way, on the blue-sky-like ocean,

An un-erasable signature of the Lord etched even on the water}

===============

Following is in a different context, but I find myself compelled to add it here:

He says in Bharat Bharati:

वह साम्प्रतिक शिक्षा हमारे सर्वथा प्रतिकूल है

हममे हमारे देश के प्रति द्वेश-मति की मूल है

होती नहीं उससे हमे निजतत्व मे अनुरक्ति है

होने न देती पूर्वजों पर वह हमारी भक्ति है

उसमे विदेशी मान का ही मोह-पूर्ण महत्व है

फल अंत मे उसका? वही दासत्व है! दासत्व है!!

{Contemporary education is entirely against us

Is root of why we are contemptuous against our own nation

With it we don’t develop a liking for our own attributes

It does not allow us to be proudly devoted to our ancestors

Instead it inculcates only a blind reverence for everything alien

But what would be the end result? Slavery! Only Slavery!}

http://ramasetu.blogspot.com/2007/12/rama-setu-in-words-of-national-poet-sri.html

Rama Setu: DMK Youth Wing’s plan for Setu Channel

December 18, 2007

DMK Youth Wing’s plan for Sethu project

R.K. Radhakrishnan and P. Sudhakar

Consultations on campaign strategy will be held soon: Stalin

TIRUNELVELI: The Youth Wing of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam will work out a road map on the Sethusamudram propaganda strategy following Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi’s call to the youth to mobilise public support for the project.

Asked when the Youth Wing would begin its campaign, Mr. Stalin said consultations would be held once he reached Chennai.

Mr. Stalin was on the Tirunelveli Medical College grounds on Monday, the venue of the weekend youth conference, to thank the support staff and partymen who had toiled for its success. “I will have to consult leaders including the Chief Minister and then we will decide how best to launch the campaign,” he said. Mr. Karunanidhi wanted the DMK youth to counter the misinformation campaign about the project. He had accused the State unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party of raking up the issue of Ramar Sethu with the sole purpose of bringing development work to a halt. The Chief Minister urged the Youth Wing to counter the propaganda with scientific facts to convince the people. Once people were for the project the task of making it a reality was much simpler. Referring to the cases in the courts on the issue, Mr. Karunanidhi reasoned that the courts did not block development schemes that helped thousands of people.

The campaign itself would be a huge task for the Youth Wing because it involved training of hundreds of volunteers to speak on the issue in more than 12,000 village panchayats across the State. Taking scientific evidence to villages would mean carrying video and satellite images of the Adams Bridge area too. “This is the reason why we need a detailed plan of action. Though the Chief Minister wants the campaign launched today [Monday] we will need some time to get things in place,” a party functionary and Youth Wing leader explained.

Asked about the Chief Minister’s comments at the conference, Mr. Stalin said the fact that Mr. Karunanidhi had wanted the Youth Wing, headed by him, to take up the Sethusamudram propaganda itself was a huge responsibility. “Don’t you think taking this message across the people is a very big responsibility?” he asked and added: “Perhaps this could be the large responsibility that I will have to shoulder.” It was not merely positions in government that were important for people like him; responsibilities like these were as important, he said.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/12/18/stories/2007121854210400.htm

Rama Setu and Ramjanmabhumi — a study in obfuscation

December 18, 2007

December 23, 2007 Editorial
Ram Sethu and Ramjanmabhoomi — A study in obfuscation

The so-called expert panel set up by DMK leader T.R. Balu’s Ministry of Shipping has accomplished a command performance, if newspaper reports are to be believed. The committee, according to a report in The Sunday Express, has submitted a two-volume report running into 150 pages recommending that there is no evidence to prove the existence of any man-made structure where the Sethusamudram canal project is to be located.

The report staying clear of Sri Ram and his historicity dutifully submitted what the UPA mandarins wanted it to state: that there was no tangible evidence to prove any man-made structure at the project location and that the bridge or Ram Sethu is like several other geo-morphological features and that the government should go ahead with the Sethu project.

This finding is not surprising. When the committee was set up its composition conveyed the intention of the government. Independent experts and the people and organisations agitating to protect Ram Sethu had expressed doubts about its brief. The committee was indifferent, even dismissive of the well-documented submissions made by the other side. It was in an unseemly hurry to wind up its findings and extend a green signal to the Sethusamudram project without even considering alternative alignments. It has over-looked all the genuine concerns of the various streams of discipline who had made excellent studies on the adverse impact of the project. The committee is to submit its report to the apex court which is hearing a PIL on Ram Sethu and the court is likely to take it up on January 16.
The Ram Sethu Protection Samiti and several others have questioned the credibility and neutrality of the members of the official panel as many of them were confirmed Hindu-baiters and were actively associated with the project. Its members like R.S. Sharma who has made a name pamphleteering for the Left and distorting ancient Indian history goes to the extent of calling Sri Ram and Sri Krishna literary characters. In fact it was the hand of people like him that resulted in the controversial affidavit in the Supreme Court. The government and the pseudo-secular elements behave as if they go entirely by scientific evidence. But every time they are confronted with unquestionable evidence they look the other way and try everything possible to deny Hindus their history.

This cannot be more glaring than in their attitude to the famous Dwaraka Marine Archaeology Project and the Ramayana Project of the ASI. Both Dr S.R. Rao and Dr B.B. Lal have revealed how indifferent the government was about funding the two ambitious projects. Their findings comprise the most invaluable contributions in our understanding of the past.

Writing in India Today, in March, 2003, Prof. B.B. Lal, former director general of the Archaeological Survey of India, revealed, “In 1951-53 when I was in the ASI, I had initiated a project to establish that there was a historical basis for the Mahabharat. I followed that up much later with the Ramayana Project. …The work at Ayodhya was taken up in the late 1970s and early 1980s much before the eruption of the Mandir-Masjid debate as part of a much bigger project…
“In Ayodhya 14 different sites were excavated and the Ramjanmabhoomi was one of them. In a trench dug immediately to the south of the Babri Masjid, remains dating from 7th century BC to 15th century AD were found. Belonging to the upper most levels was a series of pillar bases some of which may be seen running into the section close to the outer wall of the Masjid complex. Affixed to piers of the Masjid were 14 pillars bearing figures of Hindu deities, originally part of a temple.”

Prof Lal further says that protagonists of the Babri structure objected to further excavations and made wild allegations. But according to him, after the demolition, a great deal of archaeological material from within the thickness of the walls of the mosque were brought to light and it included many sculptures, architectural parts of a temple and three inscriptions, one of which revealed that the temple was built in the 12th century AD.

Thus what we are emphasising here is that the Hindu claim is based on history, archaeological evidence and faith. The country has much to gain by accepting and promoting these facts. But the policy of appeasement adopted by the pseudo-secular parties stand as a roadblock.

Prof Lal says that unfortunately only one volume on the Shringaverapura findings could be published in 1993. After that the ASI withdrew all facilities and repeated requests to successive directors general fell on deaf ears making it impossible to bring out subsequent volumes. The same is the case with the Dwaraka Project.
Why is it that the central government always too eager only to disprove the Hindu faith? What does it gain by denying India its glorious past? Does it believe that de-Hinduising the majority in the country is the grand idea of nation building?

http://tinyurl.com/yv5z7f

Rama Setu: ‘rational’ DMK should abandon Setu Channel, set up Marine Economic Zone and coastal Railway lines in Tamilnadu

December 18, 2007

Rama Setu: ‘rational’ DMK should abandon Setu Channel, set up Marine Economic Zone and coastal Railway lines in Tamilnadu – Dr. Subramanian Swamy

  1. The tenor of speeches and the resolutions passed in the recent youth convention of the DMK at Tirunelveli, and which was attended by the DMK Chief and TNCM Mr. Karunanidhi, exhibits impotent anger and deep frustration of the DMK in not been able to get implemented the Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project (SSCP). The project is stalled because it calls for cutting a canal of 300 metres wide through the Rama Setu. On my petition, the Supreme Court has granted an injunction to prevent any damage to the Setu.
  2. The DMK has been for the first time frustrated from doing what it wants. The party has always thought that if it is in power in the State and a coalition partner in the Centre then they can get anything implemented of their choice.
  3. Unfortunately this time the DMK has failed because they went against Bhagwan Sri Rama. Earlier attempts to secretly break the Setu by dredger came to naught because the dredger itself broke instead of the Setu.
  4. It is a bogus claim of the DMK that the SSCP will benefit the coastal residents of Tamil Nadu.  On the contrary, 500,000 fishermen and their families will become unemployed if the SSCP is implemented.
  5. The coastal regions of the State can be better benefited if we build a broad-gauge double railway line from Tuticorin Port along the Coast all the way to Chennai, thereby connecting to Kolkata. The Gulf of Mannar and Palk Strait should be declared a  Marine Economic Zone, and developed as a fishing industry.
  6. The Rama Setu should be declared as a pilgrim centre and enable Hindus from all over India including from the DMK to come with facility to the area.  Recently, DMK’s Information Minister P. Illamvazuthi, a Dalit, quietly left the Tirunelveli DMK convention and with his wife, went to Rameshwaram to pray to Shiva and Lord Rama to forgive him for his party’s demand to demolish the Rama Setu.

If Karunanidhi cannot bring ‘rationality’ in his own party, how can he expect the Tamils not to worship Lord Rama and the Rama Setu?

  1. It is time for Mr. Karunanidhi to realize that his brand of Dravidian politics has failed. Tamil Nadu is largely of Hindu-minded people, and while other religious minorities live in harmony. Hence rationalism of the DK variety to which Karunanidhi claims legacy, has no future in the State. Time now for him to go into retirement.

Source: December 18, 2007, Statement of Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party